Replies

Sadly, we’re not there yet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I think Trump is winning. I don’t know if he would be so well if he had taken on the sacred cows of the left right before the election by now. The indoctrination on the left is so intense, they would/will likely view exposures as traumatic. Surely there’d be wide spread civil unrest planned for any top level arrest/indictment. That nationwide unrest would be used to force mail in voting or otherwise disrupt election and it would be “Trump’s fault”.

By taking on Biden’s son, they haven’t stopped the #WALKAWAYs. I dont’ know what lies ahead but I see the exposures being handled masterfully, and at the pace the public can accept and (reasonably) follow. The information seems to be being doled out in manageable doses and it is exposing Biden Sr. I shudder to use the word “exposing” in the same sentence as “Biden”; Jr’s “obsession” with children will daily remind many of Sr’s obsession with children. *shudder*

If I were monetarily savvy, I just might understand the potential way in which this re-negotiation might impact the geopolitics of The Great Awakening. Sadly, I am not. I'll put a quote below - if you know the answer, don't be afraid to shout it out.

A New Bretton Woods Moment

By Kristalina Georgieva, IMF Managing Director
Washington, DC

October 15, 2020

"Reflecting on the dramatic change in the world over the last year, I paid a visit to the Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, where 44 men signed our Articles of Agreement in 1944. Our founders faced two massive tasks: to deal with the immediate devastation caused by the War; and to lay the foundation for a more peaceful and prosperous postwar world.

SNIP

Today we face a new Bretton Woods “moment.” A pandemic that has already cost more than a million lives. An economic calamity that will make the world economy 4.4 % smaller this year and strip an estimated $11 trillion of output by next year. And untold human desperation in the face of huge disruption and rising poverty for the first time in decades."

https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2020/10/15/sp101520-a-new-bretton-woods-moment

Q4881
Oct 17, 2020 12:36:26 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No. 11118631

There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q

Q4882
Oct 17, 2020 12:47:14 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 7abb0d No. 11118824

3773c460e43658b17f3e5fe688e10ac3f9a475660518920a92f737fa271c50dc.jpg

PANIC IN DC.

THE BEST IS YET TO COME.

The information seems to be being doled out in manageable doses and it is exposing Biden Sr.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yes, I agree; and also believe Trump is in excellent position to win the election.

There's going to be a lot more psychological warfare tactics from both sides before ED.