Replies

Q4881
Oct 17, 2020 12:36:26 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: f457dc No. 11118631

There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q

Q4882
Oct 17, 2020 12:47:14 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 7abb0d No. 11118824

3773c460e43658b17f3e5fe688e10ac3f9a475660518920a92f737fa271c50dc.jpg

PANIC IN DC.

THE BEST IS YET TO COME.

This is right now.

Operation: #BendedKnee
1:11 PM EST (Adjust for local time)

https://twitter.com/Richard74195773/status/1317451474465533953

I didn’t ever understand there are no QAnons. I’m
a little taken back..

The moniker/term, “Anons”, has been referenced from the beginning and yet so far as I know, Q never posted an objection, correction or clarification of the term.

This may be to the fault of 8ch. Q was there and so were the anonymous followers of Socrates Q.

There were “autists” on board, for use of their gifts of deciphering and for looking at Q questions. These were not directly classified as “Q”, or MI, to my knowledge, but lumped in with research Anons, instead, on the forbidden chans, and everywhere, among all who were following the Q map, the Q clock and Q questions.