Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Disestablishmentarian

I do not mean to dis you, Dis. You are doing an AWESOME job with the data you have.

Meant to post this the other day, but perhaps did not. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8820053/Nevada-directs-nursing-homes-stop-using-rapid-COVID-19-tests-high-rates-false-positives.html Nevada health officials order nursing homes to STOP using rapid COVID-19 tests after finding 60% of positive results were false...Note these were Ag-Ab tests

Re RT-PCR test, depending on the number of cycles you run ie how many times you reverse transcriptase, then PCR, depends on the amplification of the original test fragment in question. I have read, and posted maybe months ago, stated that the inventor of PCR analysis should NEVER be used for diagnosis, for this very reason. Different countries/tests are using different parameters (37 cycles is normal, but have exceeded 40 cycles). The test results further have not been quantified against patient symptometology, as far as I can tell, nor have they come to grips with the reality that patients that had COVID-19, and recovered, still may test positive because the rna fragments being evaluated are present in the white cells of the patient. Further, I have read (and maybe posted) that the initial strands used for amplification are present in the human genome; also are the strands from covid-19, or any old plain jane corona virus.

Many of the antibody tests getting FDA rushed approval for diagnosis (when I looked at them earlier in this mess a long time ago) were to coronaviruses. Coronaviruses can be a cause of the common cold.

Thus, the positive test numbers are dubious, in my humble opinion. Your graphical and tabular data are very nice, however, and much appreciated.


488 posted on 10/13/2020 4:47:08 AM PDT by smileyface ("The illuminati's whole philosophy demands the use, abuse, sacrifice and consumption of children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]


To: smileyface

Mt FluBros post at #7:

First U.S. “re-infection” in Nevada calls into question the effectiveness of any vaccine developed.
It also calls into question the COVID-19 indicator tests; are they identifying COVID-19 specifically or just ANY CORONA virus (common cold) present in the patient?

You can catch it AGAIN?!?
Yep...just like the common cold.
Now, let go of your pearls and go outside.


492 posted on 10/13/2020 4:57:31 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson