11 4.
Election day + 1.
In which Q drop have we seen (day) + 1 before?
This one:
Posted on 10/11/2020 10:00:05 PM PDT by ransomnote
majestic scene.
thanx for sharing
2. Highly (and Deliberately) Contaminated Data from mid-June Forward
(contaminated with antibody-test, duplicates, false positives and dubious “Probables”)
3. Another Layer of Fraud in both deaths and Cases was added 7/28
Date New Total Linear Mod
Cases Cases Since
Actual + FAKE Actual + FAKE 4/2/2020
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
glad you are including the disclaimers for fraud & FAKE
Battlefield Strategy:
Dems walk out.
POTUS withdraws ACB.
POTUS names recess appointment in order to preserve ACB for lifetime position.
Enter Jeffrey Beauregard Sessions.
TRUST Sessions
BardsFM tweets:
Six steps to Nov 3, 2020.
1) Stand firmly with GOD and in Prayer daily.
2) Ignore EVERYTHING the Media reports.
3) Trust @POTUS
4) Talk to your neighbors, even if they hate @realDonaldTrump ... that will change.
5) Break bread and pray with your community.
6) VOTE.
......
What can 4. be that will change such deluded, hardened hearts?
:: What’s that in Michigan? ::
Sky event.
Trump supporters at rally drown Acosta out. Very satisfying!
https://twitter.com/debra4kag/status/1315824177975308288?s=21
I do not mean to dis you, Dis. You are doing an AWESOME job with the data you have.
Meant to post this the other day, but perhaps did not. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8820053/Nevada-directs-nursing-homes-stop-using-rapid-COVID-19-tests-high-rates-false-positives.html Nevada health officials order nursing homes to STOP using rapid COVID-19 tests after finding 60% of positive results were false...Note these were Ag-Ab tests
Re RT-PCR test, depending on the number of cycles you run ie how many times you reverse transcriptase, then PCR, depends on the amplification of the original test fragment in question. I have read, and posted maybe months ago, stated that the inventor of PCR analysis should NEVER be used for diagnosis, for this very reason. Different countries/tests are using different parameters (37 cycles is normal, but have exceeded 40 cycles). The test results further have not been quantified against patient symptometology, as far as I can tell, nor have they come to grips with the reality that patients that had COVID-19, and recovered, still may test positive because the rna fragments being evaluated are present in the white cells of the patient. Further, I have read (and maybe posted) that the initial strands used for amplification are present in the human genome; also are the strands from covid-19, or any old plain jane corona virus.
Many of the antibody tests getting FDA rushed approval for diagnosis (when I looked at them earlier in this mess a long time ago) were to coronaviruses. Coronaviruses can be a cause of the common cold.
Thus, the positive test numbers are dubious, in my humble opinion. Your graphical and tabular data are very nice, however, and much appreciated.
Yes it is spiritual and things have deteriorated because of me - and my generation. We saw good traditions challenged starting back in the 50's and continued to presume that we were a good people and goodness would prevail. Things continued to deteriorate and we never faced up to the attack. The educators and the media corrupted our children; some of us fought that battle but couldn't sign up to fight the war.
Now we fight or we fail; there is no choice. sigh
Gen. FLYnn endorses Laura Loomer:
“Florida needs Laura Loomer for Congressional District 21. Laura is a courageous fighter for regular people, NOT a career politician, and she always stands up for American values and principles. I strongly endorse her and pray the good people of District 21 join with me to get Laura to Washington DC. Donate to Laura’s campaign and provide her YOUR Support today!!!”
https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/flynn-endorses-loomer/
Spying on Trump is bad, but he knows the haters will not care. They always justify their bad behavior.
Obama and HRC lying about OBL and getting blackmailed by Iran because they double crossed each other...then murdered the ST6 members? This would be impossible to justify even for the haters.
Any chance this is what Durham is actually investigating all along?
Mt FluBros post at #7:
First U.S. “re-infection” in Nevada calls into question the effectiveness of any vaccine developed.
It also calls into question the COVID-19 indicator tests; are they identifying COVID-19 specifically or just ANY CORONA virus (common cold) present in the patient?
You can catch it AGAIN?!?
Yep...just like the common cold.
Now, let go of your pearls and go outside.
You’re Welcome.
Sorry, missed in previous post re HIV...
https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/testing/index.html
HIV Tests for Screening and Diagnosis
HIV tests are very accurate, but no test can detect the virus immediately after infection. How soon a test can detect HIV depends upon different factors, including the type of test being used. There are three types of HIV diagnostic tests: nucleic acid tests (NAT), antigen/antibody tests, and antibody tests.
NATs look for the actual virus in the blood. This test is very expensive and is not routinely used for HIV screening unless the person recently had a high-risk exposure or a possible exposure with early symptoms of HIV infection. A NAT can usually detect HIV infection 10 to 33 days after an exposure.
Antigen/antibody tests look for both HIV antibodies and antigens. Antibodies are produced by your immune system when you’re exposed to viruses like HIV. Antigens are foreign substances that cause your immune system to activate. If you have HIV, an antigen called p24 is produced even before antibodies develop. Antigen/antibody tests are recommended for testing done in labs and are now common in the United States. An antigen/antibody test performed by a laboratory on blood from a vein can usually detect HIV infection 18 to 45 days after an exposure. There is also a rapid antigen/antibody test available that is done with a finger prick. Antigen/antibody tests done with blood from a finger prick can take longer to detect HIV (18 to 90 days after an exposure).
Antibody tests look for antibodies to HIV in your blood or oral fluid. Antibody tests can take 23 to 90 days to detect HIV infection after an exposure. Most rapid tests and the only FDA-approved HIV self-test are antibody tests. In general, antibody tests that use blood from a vein can detect HIV sooner after infection than tests done with blood from a finger prick or with oral fluid.
An initial HIV test usually will either be an antigen/antibody test or an antibody test. If the initial HIV test is a rapid test or a self-test and it is positive, the individual should go to a health care provider to get follow-up testing. If the initial HIV test is a laboratory test and it is positive, the laboratory will usually conduct follow-up testing on the same blood sample as the initial test. Although HIV tests are generally very accurate, follow-up testing allows the health care provider to be sure the diagnosis is right.
``````````
I think blood donated/collected by the RedCross or for use in fractionation is screened by rt-pcr, but would have to dig for that answer.
Project Veritas tweets:
You thought we were done? Not even close. More bombshell tape dropping tomorrow. It’s gonna be a long month for the haters.
https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1315815534227750912?s=20
The tail end of the Boomers saw intense societal upheaval when they were children. They wanted to foster trust, acceptance, and personal empowerment in their own children. Enter the Millenials...
11 4.
Election day + 1.
In which Q drop have we seen (day) + 1 before?
This one:
Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett Confirmation Hearing - Day 2, Part 1
Smiles.
For moi, that right there, is a little preview of Heaven :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.