Dis:
LS has, on several occasions here, opined that he does not look at QAnon, does not understand Q/QAnon to be a valid comms outlet, and simply dismisses US/Anons and UToobers as nuts following a disinformation campaign and possibly a LARP.
Now that he’s been Q’d, he is in a struggle for self-validation.
Understanding his ego, he will never make a “Q-positive” decision.
I know LS does not follow Q, and has said some disparaging things.
On the other hand, his information on the election is still outstanding—the very best I know as a matter of fact, since no one is giving me access to the Trump campaign’s internal analysis (even Q!).
Regarding Q: It seems to me like those who are professional political writers and pundits—as in writing articles or books for money—have to make a decision about Q.
Since Q gets the lion’s share of “News” way before any “journalist”, no matter how well-connected and diligent, if they overtly key on Q, they may think they lose their own panache.
Incidentally, I do not intend to psychologize LS or anyone else ... just utilizing some empathy to understand their position.