“I gave you a scientific experiment you could perform yourself, and not for a single moment did you approach it with anything but fake science and insults.”
Your conclusion was totally false. You cannot back it up.
You have not done any of the work to determine the truth of falsity of my conclusion. None at all. You have taken your pre-baked assumption and declared it as fact without any scientific method applied whatsoever.
It’s a repeatable experiment - a hard-and-fast requirement to be genuine science - unlike almost anything done in particle physics today.
Anyway... you clearly lack the education in basic scientific method to see how outrageously anti-scientific your approach is, and I lack the time to fully educate you on the basics of what is actual science and what isn’t.
You can start with this: If you don’t have a repeatable, independently verifiable experiment, it is BY DEFINITION not science.