You have not done any of the work to determine the truth of falsity of my conclusion. None at all. You have taken your pre-baked assumption and declared it as fact without any scientific method applied whatsoever.
It’s a repeatable experiment - a hard-and-fast requirement to be genuine science - unlike almost anything done in particle physics today.
Anyway... you clearly lack the education in basic scientific method to see how outrageously anti-scientific your approach is, and I lack the time to fully educate you on the basics of what is actual science and what isn’t.
You can start with this: If you don’t have a repeatable, independently verifiable experiment, it is BY DEFINITION not science.
“You can start with this: If you don’t have a repeatable, independently verifiable experiment, it is BY DEFINITION not science.”
Your ‘experiment’ is not science. You fail to provide even the slimmest verification.