[bagster]

If there is a disavowel in there, it is half-baked ;-)

I just returned from a dangerous undercover mission beyond the trees. I wonder, if President Trump can talk about Q on national television, can we talk about it on Free Republic?

Just wondering.

Two people I saw calling the end of Q per Trump. And trusty old Romanesq led the charge. He's always trying to put a round peg in a square whole, and he doesn't disappoint.

I'll post my thoughts that I put on that thread so I don't have to type them out again.

Bagster's take on Trumps Qanon comments.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3875837/posts?page=116#116

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3875837/posts?page=114#114

I had a few more tidbits to say, but the gist is, if our President wanted to debunk Q, he would have. He didn't.

There was almost radio silence on the Q topic. I felt a mood shift. The more Q is mainstreamed, the more FReepers seem to be at least thinking about it.

Professionals like Romanesq seem like the lone voice in the wilderness.

The winds are shifting, my fellows.

And winter is coming.

(here's the video again)

https://t.co/moyJnTWZsj— Bagster (@Bagster188) August 19, 2020

[KittenClaws]

There was almost radio silence on the Q topic. I felt a mood shift. The more Q is mainstreamed, the more FReepers seem to be at least thinking about it.

———————-

True enough, but don’t forget the pride factor.

And there is a lot of it.

(don’t pretend you don’t know what I mean)

[greeneyes]

Late to the party-but I supported your post out beyond the trees. Linked to some interesting factoids about Satanism and human trafficking.

Link to the post for all those interested.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3875837/posts?page=133#133

[meyer]

Geezus, that Roman dude is stuipid!

[norsky]

I just returned from a dangerous undercover mission beyond the trees. I wonder, if President Trump can talk about Q on national television, can we talk about it on Free Republic?

Just wondering if you use a different handle when you post on different FR sites.

[bitt]

Obama makes me puke. What a miserable POS.

[mbrfl]

It is interesting that POTUS said he doesn’t know much about the movement. Words have meaning. He didn’t say he doesn’t know much about Q, but rather the Q movement (i.e. Q followers). Nothing he said today contradicts his knowledge of Q or his role in it, but it does leave the impression to the average listener that he is not involved. Any thoughts on how he might pivot his message when he deems the time is right to reveal more about Q and his involvement?

[Kalam]

...I just returned from a dangerous undercover mission beyond the trees. I wonder, if President Trump can talk about Q on national television...

____________________________________________________________________________

I find it very interesting how the President's non-denial is more accurate, truthful and obvious than imaginable. It is hidden in plain sight/speech.

When President Trump said during his August 19 press conference, "Well, I don’t know much about the movement other than I understand they like me very much, which I appreciate." He gave multiple confirmations.

First, the obvious take on what he said is that when he says he does not know much about the movement, he is saying that he does know something about it. BUT...

Second, the president is also telling us that it isn't his department to know a whole lot a bout "Q Anon," the movement. That job is delegated to Q. Now Q can and probably does give him briefings. So. the president is fully informed and aware of Q, after all he is Q+.

Last, President Trump is executing "The Plan flawlessly." He knows that Q+ (himself) and Q has it all. But, he does appreciate the anons liking what he's doing as President.

To summarize one could say, "Q+ knows Q and Q knows Q Anon."