But there is another side to that coin - people that are NOT guilty getting sent to the big house for something they did not do. E.G., Roger Stone, General Flynn, some nobody that made a video that was blamed for Benghazi.
some nobody that made a video that was blamed for Benghazi.
*************
After this is all over, that man (a Coptic Christian) needs to be made whole. I would love for a lot of Clinton Foundation funds to go in his pocket.
My concern is how many guilty escape using the slam dunk criteria.
But there is another side to that coin - people that are NOT guilty getting sent to the big house for something they did not do. E.G., Roger Stone, General Flynn, some nobody that made a video that was blamed for Benghazi.
****************************
I certainly see your point. I am failing to make my
point clear. If I’m an obvious in-your-face crook, I’m
delighted the slam dunk criteria is being used. Aren’t
there some decent and courageous prosecutors that know they must go after those they know to be law breakers
despite it not being a slam dunk, for the sake of justice?