Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: imardmd1

SCOTUS decision in 1946 (Marsh v Alabama) said free speech couldn’t be limited in “public square” even if the public square was privately owned.


34 posted on 07/28/2020 2:31:18 AM PDT by RandFan (3C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: RandFan
Twitter, privately owned, is not the public square to which all are admitted and all permitted to speak. Twitter is a private forum of whom its management decides who can join, what they can discuss, and how the participants can say it. Donald Trump can express his opinions as long as he obeys the rules. If the management assesses a particular ongoing matter to cause harm to its business or to other participants, it can declare Trump to be playing out of bounds and sideline or eject him from the forum as a commenter.

The proprietor of a social media business is the gatekeeper. Free Republic operates in a similar fashion. It has published the rules for engagement. If the moderator decides, an active member can be zotted without recourse, because it is not PUBLIC.

Get with it, my FRiend.

83 posted on 07/28/2020 6:19:52 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson