Actually you prove my point exactly.
I offered an explanation for books & perfume being overpriced but I was immediately jumped on by:
Annette
CJ Wolf
Tang soon
Cletus
And now you Bitt. And sadly the only thing I did was explain that not all overpriced items are criminal.
You people desperately need to get out of your insulated bubbles.
And just because some of them aren't, doesn't mean all of them aren't.
So what's your point?
:: immediately jumped on ::
Sir, I take umbrage.
Since you invoked my handle, please address the concept of “jumped on” from my asking of the reasonable comparative question of your example (one: an anomaly) and several of the same in the same place (more than a trend).
If you post here defending a concept (or, attempting to debunk it), you should be able to bring all “weapons” to the fore in answer to reasonable questions.
Such as, what do you mean by “jumped on”?
Enlighten us...cause I just don’t see it.
Did you hope to come here, say your piece and not get questioned about your position?
Please, tell us.
It’s a reasonable question.
Saying that SOME overpriced items are very suspicious is not the same as claiming that ALL overpriced items are suspicious.
Your point that some items are overpriced for benign reasons is true.
But we are not discussing benignly overpriced items.
enough of this slide.
The discussions have been mostly about Wayfair. With items that are way over-priced and have suspicious childrens’ names.
This is not the only FR thread discussing this.