Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote

The question becomes not, “Who received the checks,” but “Who cashed those checks?”


2 posted on 07/03/2020 6:24:39 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine

Actually, weren’t a lot of those in the form of gift cards? In which case, your local mail person got them.


3 posted on 07/03/2020 6:27:41 AM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Mrs from New England and myself still haven’t got anything.

I guess we have to die to get a check.


4 posted on 07/03/2020 6:28:38 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

stop the tests...or keep them private (I know...they’d still get leaked to FakeNewsMSM).

it’s so evident the test numbers are being used as yet another weapon against President Trump.

never forget Rosenstein’s sister, Nancy Messonnier, is still at CDC...and who knows who else is there.

2 Jul: Yahoo: After months of being silenced, CDC is easing back into public view
Alexander Nazaryan, National Correspondent
WASHINGTON: On June 12, 2020, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did something it had not done for months: It held a press briefing.
Widely touted as the finest public health agency in the world, the CDC had been dormant since March 9, when one of its top officials held a teleconference with journalists. On that day, Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the agency’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, counseled the American public to “fight the urge to buy a mask” to protect against the coronavirus.

Then came a protracted and, for many, problematic silence. CDC officials hope that is coming to an end, but a pressing question remains: Can the agency reclaim its voice while avoiding political blowback from the White House? Can it find a way to communicate valuable scientific information after three muted months during which some substantive communications from the CDC came only in the form of leaks to the press?...

At the same time, it’s difficult to see Trump’s push to reopen churches, among other moves, as anything but political. As he has demanded to reopen the economy and restart campaign rallies, the CDC has uneasily stood by, sometimes offering gentle caution, sometimes saying nothing.

A spokesperson for the CDC appeared to validate the White House’s suspicion, saying that some within the agency were undermining its standing in Washington. The spokesperson — who could only speak frankly about the situation if granted anonymity — said they were “disappointed” by leaks from the CDC, referencing releases of information to news outlets that seemed to undermine, frustrate or complicate the official position of the administration.
“I hear where the White House is coming from,” the CDC spokesperson said, using with Yahoo News the same protection of journalistic anonymity that alleged CDC leakers have presumably used with other outlets.

Just days after the spokesperson spoke to Yahoo News, Politico reported that the White House was planning to blame the CDC for the administration’s shortfalls in handling the pandemic, which has killed close to 130,000 Americans...

The agency spokesperson told Yahoo News that if the CDC can “stick to the science,” it should be able to hold “regular and frequent” briefings. The spokesperson did make clear that Shuchat and Messonnier will almost certainly not be part of those briefings, which will be conducted by Redfield and so-called incident managers knowledgeable about specific aspects of the pandemic...
“Public health is always political,” says Curran, the former CDC official now at Emory University. “But public health should never be partisan in an epidemic.”
https://news.yahoo.com/after-months-of-being-silenced-the-cdc-is-easing-back-into-public-view-090053863.html


12 posted on 07/03/2020 6:41:51 AM PDT by MAGAthon (h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Also, were these payments designed to buy votes?


13 posted on 07/03/2020 6:52:53 AM PDT by Savage Beast (President Trump, praying for guidance, giving his salary to charity, is on the Side of the Angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

The question becomes not, “Who received the checks,” but “Who cashed those checks?”

Exactly!


20 posted on 07/03/2020 8:00:27 AM PDT by Flick Lives (My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Pearls Before Swine

The question becomes not, “Who received the checks,” but “Who cashed those checks?”

Another question that plagues our country. So what, if the number of CV-19 positive tests are increasing?

The real question is how many DEATHS are there?....real CV-19 deaths not cash bonus deaths for the hospital’s bottom-line.


30 posted on 07/03/2020 1:03:26 PM PDT by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson