Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: KittenClaws; All

I printed out the document at the link that Q drop had to Rand org. Number 3 seems to be a potent point:

1. Original intent- to end Federal Troops monitoring State(not Federal?) elections in former confederate states.

2. Navy and Marines were not included-but are covered under DOD regulations.

3. All military are exempt from prohibition pursuant to presidential power to quell domestic violence.

4. War on Drugs is exempted-ie military can be used for law enforcement as part of the war on drugs.

5. Coast Guard is exempt during peacetime.

6. Aerial photographic and visual search and surveillance by military doesn’t violate the act.

***********************
footnotes for further research:

2 The language of the Posse Comitatus Act was further amended by congressional action reflected in P.L. 103-322 (1994).

3 For further details, the reader is directed to: Lujan (1997); Department of the Army (undated); and to the notes of various court decisions refining the interpretation of the Posse Comitatus Act. For the latter, see United States Code, Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedures, Sections 1361 to 1950 2000 Cumulative Annual Pocket Part, St.
Paul, Minn.: West Group, 2000, pp. 13–17.

4- 10 U.S. Code Sections 331 through 334 provide guidance. Section 332 states: “Whenever the President considers the unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the United States, makes it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any state or territory by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings,
he may call into federal service such of the militia of any state, and use such of the armed forces to suppress the rebellion” (Lujan, 1997
******************

LINK:

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1251/MR1251.AppD.pdf


937 posted on 06/25/2020 4:59:52 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies ]


To: greeneyes

Good info, thanks!


950 posted on 06/25/2020 5:33:19 PM PDT by KittenClaws ("There is no 1502 Johnson" ~ Joan Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 937 | View Replies ]

To: greeneyes
4. War on Drugs is exempted-ie military can be used for law enforcement as part of the war on drugs.

Not in CONUS they aren't. Title 32 NG (under state control) can be used in their own state or in an adjacent state with the Governor's concurrence.

visual search and surveillance by military doesn't violate the act.

Search or reconnaissance is allowed by Title 10 (AD) surveillance isn't.

1,018 posted on 06/25/2020 8:01:50 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 937 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson