“Dan is to blame”
Dan must be Dan Scavino. Why would Q mention this, basically outting Dan? I think we all know the Scavino is tied in to Q whether directly or indirectly.
Game theory?
JMO:
Q is becoming more mainstream and more accessible to the general public. Those of us who have been following since near the beginning already know this. But people who are just arriving are (mostly) less likely to have the patience to look for patterns and “obscure proofs”. The people arriving today are (mostly) going to need more direct proof and more direct explanations of what is going on.
At first, I though “WOW! How can they not ask the question now?” But I’m guessing the question won’t be asked / answered until after the election. If Q were revealed before then, it would take away the mystery / excitement / anticipation. I think it’s going to be a tease right up until then. But I think it will be far less “obscure” with each passing day. I think by election day, it’s going to be so obvious that only those who are willfully ignoring it or monumentally stupid will not be able to see it.
Again, JMO. Every time I guess about timing, I’m wrong. So take that for what it’s worth.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Savvy FReeQs have known about Scavino's involvement with the Q team -- ever since POTUS Trump's first big Asia trip in November, 2017:
That's Scavino -- in 2017, on AF1 -- at lower left.
Dan S. is also POTUS' "Comunicator" (aka, "Tweeter")...
TXnMA
