HUGE and worth digging, IMO.
This is the first time I’ve heard of this. Thought I knew most of the dirt by now. I guess there is much more to be revealed. It certainly fits in with the other pieces that we know. I’m hoping I have some time today to do a little digging / verification on this one.
THANKQ!
New Q 4259
https://twitter.com/HouseGOP/status/1276589294010982401
Did order(s) violate government mandated policies?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-11/suits-against-state-officials
“The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken.”
Q