Posted on 06/19/2020 11:01:11 AM PDT by SJackson
Remote wilderness areas and national parks in the western United States are getting a dusting of plastic every year, perhaps 1000 tons or more, according to a new study. Up to one-quarter of the microscopic pieces of plasticwhich come from carpets, clothing, and even spray paintmay originate in storms passing over nearby cities, whereas the rest likely comes from farther flung locations. The findings, the first to tease apart geographic origins, add to mounting evidence that such microplastic pollution is common worldwide.
We created something that wont go away, says Janice Brahney, a biogeochemist at Utah State University and lead author on the new paper. Its now circulating around the globe.
Brahney didnt set out to track plastic pollution. Instead, she wanted to study how wind-blown dust delivers nutrients to ecosystems. So, she set up a pilot study with the National Atmospheric Deposition Program to collect such dust at a network of weather stations usually used to sample rainwater across the United States, mostly in remote locations.
Looking at samples from 11 remote areas in the western United States, including the Grand Canyon and Joshua Tree National Park, Brahney noticed brightly colored fragments under the microscope. I realized that I was looking at deposition of plastics, which was really shocking. Brahney didnt have funding to study microplastic pollution, so she did the analysis on her own time, spending a very long and stressful year of evenings and weekends counting nearly 15,000 tiny piecesmost of them less than one-third the width of a human hair.
Brahney found a lot of tiny fibers, likely from clothes, carpets, and other textiles. She also found minuscule particles, about 30% of which were brightly colored spheres. Smaller than the plastic microbeads that have been used in cosmetics and other personal care products, the spheres are components of paints that might be released to the atmosphere during spray painting, she says.
Microplastic beads, like this one on the tip of tweezers, are used in paint. JANICE BRAHNEY/UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Chelsea Rochman, an ecologist at the University of Toronto who studies microplastics, calls that finding striking. The paints are a whole new source that hasnt really been discussed before.
The remaining 70% of the particles were harder to classify. So Brahney and a colleague turned to a technique called Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy to analyze those particles and the fibers. It showed that the samples contained on average 4% plastic. That number blew us away, says Brahney, who had expected less than 1%.
After running the numbers, Brahney and her colleagues estimated that about 132 pieces of microplastic land on every square meter of wilderness each day. That adds up to more than 1000 tons of plastic per year across national parks and other protected areas of the western United Statesthe equivalent of 300 million plastic water bottles, they report today in Science. Other studies have found similar amounts of microplastics in remote locations, including Europes Pyrenees Mountains and in Arctic. But the new study has far more detailed data, which helped Brahney in her next step: figuring out where the plastic was coming from.
To do that, Brahney used a weather model to identify the paths of storms for 48 hours before they reached the sampling sites. Storms that had passed over or near large cities carried more microplastic than other storms, she found. The largest amounts were carried in storms that had passed over Denver; these storms deposited 14 times as much microplastic in the Rocky Mountain National Park sample station as storms that came from other directions. The pieces of microplastic were also larger than those that settled out of the air in dry weather, suggesting the strong winds of the storms had picked up the heavier pieces.
Brahney says most of the plastic is likely coming from more distant locations, brought in via high-altitude winds rather than regional rainstorms. About 75% of the plastic was deposited during dry rather than rainy weather. Those pieces tended to be smallerthe size of extremely fine dust, which can travel for thousands of kilometers. In addition, the deposition patterns showed some influence of the jet stream. Higher elevation sites also tended to have more microplastic, further implying that the particles move high in the atmosphereand may circulate globally.
Rochman calls this piece of the study the wow part. Trying to understand the patterns and processes of how microplastics move around the globe is only just beginning, she says.
Brahney is now working with atmospheric scientists who specialize in dust transport to study such questions as how plastic particles move through the atmosphere, where they might come from, and how much could be in the air. Much of this microplastic might have been circulating for years, if not decades, she says. The particles may have first settled in farm fields, or deserts, or the ocean and then have been picked up again by winds as part of a global plastic cycle.
Wow. Something new to be freaked out about. Cool
Well, that does it, we’re doomed. These microscopic plastic particles accumulated over the years is how it all ends.
This is how soil is made.....................
The universe wanted plastic
https://youtu.be/NBRquiS1pis
These microscopic plastic particles accumulated over the years is how it all ends.
**********
Donno. That plastic stuff is pretty durable. This might be how we finally get that immortal thing to happen.
Slooowly replace the rot prone parts of ourselves with plastic.
Covid, move aside, the reel killer is here.
Wow. I picked the wrong day to stop wearing a mask.
Can’t they use it to plug the hole in the ozone layer?
A great deal of plastic is subject to oxidation, and breakdown with exposure to sunlight.
Scientist get grants when their “research” confirms the left’s narrative.
I no longer trust scientist to be honest.
I have no way of knowing if this report is accurate. I do know that somewhere down the line it will be used to regulate our lives.
“Brahney and her colleagues estimated” Is that not always the case?
A few minutes I sawed some plastic. Rather than blowing the sawdust into the yard I vacuumed it up. Yes it’ll end up in the landfill, but not in my yard.
It breaks my heart to see beautiful plastic containers such as the liquid laundry soap containers be thrown away.
I don’t consider myself an environmentalist but for one thing we’re throwing away too much un-degradable or possibly harmful stuff.
Another thing: numerous materials go into the gadgets we buy and ultimately throw away. The individual materials once existed in concentrations within the earth. Now, in the landfills, all of the materials are mixed up making reclaiming them too expensive, so just leave them in the landfills and restart with newly extracted materials.
We have lots of dry, open, vacant, in-the-middle-of-nowhere space here in UT. 100 tons would fit into some obscure canyon in the middle of nowhere...and not bother anything. It could do it each year for 1000’s of years...and not bother anything. What incredible BS this latest “concern is”. Who cares??? These eco-nitwits are too much.
Taxpayers have money stolen from them to pay this eco-nitwit “scientist”. What an incredible waste of resources. Does she realize that her life is worthless? Just askin’ for a friend.
Plastic bad, ban plastic.
I recall driving through an area in the midwest/west and being told that the “sand dunes” that surrounded us were actually natural asbestos dunes. It was so dusty the car was leaving a contrail.
There is a region in Africa where the dust is made of volcanic glass particles. Walking barefoot in the dust turns you feet into giant warts.
Oh, and 7/10 of the planet is covered with a deadly liquid that kills you by suffocation.
Ahh yes, DHMO, I've heard of that stuff....Nasty.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.