Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Meaning what? What’s on the outside of the known boundary? Yeah, think on that a while.


2 posted on 06/08/2020 1:03:19 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Get your houses in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: samadams2000

God............................


3 posted on 06/08/2020 1:05:09 PM PDT by Red Badger (Always trust God............but wash your hands......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

What if we live in just one of many universes. The multiverse theory is very unprovable but possible.

Then there is the “rubberband” theory. Which is an expanding and contracting universe which collapses on itself and begins again, and again...

Fascinating stuff.


7 posted on 06/08/2020 1:12:04 PM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samadams2000
What’s on the outside of the known boundary?

I don't know, but you need a photo ID to get in.

9 posted on 06/08/2020 1:13:49 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samadams2000

meaning the entire “Big Bang” paradigm is just flat out wrong


11 posted on 06/08/2020 1:15:07 PM PDT by thoughtomator (here comes the switch to Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samadams2000

“We found no evidence of these first-generation Population III stars in this cosmic time interval,” said Bhatawdekar.

“These results have profound astrophysical consequences as they show that galaxies must have formed much earlier than we thought.”

Hmmmm...maybe your theory of the creation of the universe is wrong...like evolution, gotta keep resetting the time line to fit the pet theory?


15 posted on 06/08/2020 1:17:47 PM PDT by jagusafr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samadams2000

At first glance. I think the diagram should be reversed. Hubble and the galaxies we can readily see should be at the fringe of the expanding sphere while older stars/galaxies, etc., down to the Big Bang should be at the core.

...Unless these are the things Hubble observes no matter which direction it is pointed.


16 posted on 06/08/2020 1:18:09 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samadams2000

Meaning what?

...

The answer is in the article:

“These results have profound astrophysical consequences as they show that galaxies must have formed much earlier than we thought.”


19 posted on 06/08/2020 1:20:04 PM PDT by Moonman62 (http://www.freerepublic.com/~moonman62/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samadams2000
Meaning what? What’s on the outside of the known boundary? Yeah, think on that a while.

Nothingness. There is no outside, just nothingness.

24 posted on 06/08/2020 1:28:47 PM PDT by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samadams2000

Infinity.


33 posted on 06/08/2020 1:55:03 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: samadams2000

When we were in high school, we use to ask a teacher if the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into. They reacted with impatience.

In college, same question, same reaction.

I have read a few supposedly scientific explanations, but they don’t make sense.


39 posted on 06/08/2020 2:38:23 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson