I posted that last night - the first instance that I found of the image from Tineye was on 6/1 sourced from New York Post.
This still doesn’t help us though - what we need to see is a copy of the page as it appeared on 5/17 when the tweet was posted with the image as it appeared on that day.
HOWEVER as I’ve just posted above, we can no longer do that because Google has REMOVED the image from their cached data. This defies explanation and implicates Google.
I posted this on QResearch #9521278 so if I’m correct then “Q” team can redirect anons.
TBD + WWG1WGA :)
See my 260.
Steven W. wrote:
“I posted that last night - the first instance that I found of the image from Tineye was on 6/1 sourced from New York Post.
This still doesn’t help us though - what we need to see is a copy of the page as it appeared on 5/17 when the tweet was posted with the image as it appeared on that day.
HOWEVER as I’ve just posted above, we can no longer do that because Google has REMOVED the image from their cached data. This defies explanation and implicates Google.
I posted this on QResearch #9521278 so if I’m correct then “Q” team can redirect anons.
TBD + WWG1WGA :)”
Thanks, y’all; can the way back machine grab the info that was posted on may 17th?