Steven W. wrote:
“I posted that last night - the first instance that I found of the image from Tineye was on 6/1 sourced from New York Post.
This still doesn’t help us though - what we need to see is a copy of the page as it appeared on 5/17 when the tweet was posted with the image as it appeared on that day.
HOWEVER as I’ve just posted above, we can no longer do that because Google has REMOVED the image from their cached data. This defies explanation and implicates Google.
I posted this on QResearch #9521278 so if I’m correct then “Q” team can redirect anons.
TBD + WWG1WGA :)”
Thanks, y’all; can the way back machine grab the info that was posted on may 17th?
I posted the link above - you just need to reconstruct it because FR (from what I recall) does not like archive site links here.
But use the Google cache as the source here - same result = NADA. NOTHING. ZIP. ... these sites that archived the page as it appeared on the day it was posted and then recorded the image that accompanied the tweet on 5/17 ... no longer render such image.
The question of course is why? If the image was *NOT* the one that is being rendered now then we’d see that. But we can’t see that because they’re no longer rendering the image. Which suggests to me the image recorded at the time the page was “crawled” when it was first posted implicates them ... so they’re no longer rendering the image. TBD + WWG1WGA :)