[DoodleBob]

He also wrote this nonsense - which says children may benefit by being raised by "good citizens" vs "good parents":

(A professor wrote) "When you have people who have a lot of wealth alongside this racial privilege, they're ultimately making decision that benefit their own kids, and I don't know how you really interrupt that...Everyone is trying to do the best for their kid," she says. "But I actually think that there are times when maybe the best interest of your own kid isn't actually the best choice. Ultimately, being a good citizen sometimes conflicts with being good parents. And sometimes maybe parents should decide to be good citizens over being good parents." That could mean voting to raise taxes so to better fund public schools. Maybe in our case it should have meant choosing a public school rather than a private one.

This would be funny if these liberals actually DID what they wrote, because their kids may turn out better than their parents. But they won't do it...

...but you can bet this pronouncement, e.g. forcing parents to NOT take kids to Church so they become "better citizens", will shortly be coming to a re-education camp near you.

[Mark17]

Would that per chance, be Harry Dean Stanton, in Red Dawn? 😁

[A_perfect_lady]

Ultimately, being a good citizen sometimes conflicts with being good parents.

This is as close as many of them will come to acknowledging that the world they dream of would require the destruction of the family, and of most of what makes us human.

Moreover, what NO ONE will acknowledge is that even if rich white liberals disadvantage their own children deliberately in the name of social justice, all they are really doing is making their child pay for the parents' good fortune. They are far more comfortable voting for things that disadvantage whites in other social classes than their own, both above them and below them, again, to make other whites pay for what they have but feel they don't deserve.