Try reading this and it falls into place.
The disagreement about military was, from what it looks like to me, a show disagreement. (Leaving Mattis out of the picture, he’s not in the administration anyway!)
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3851914/posts?page=288#288
Warning- Language
__________________________________
https://twitter.com/DontBeFooledWWG/status/1268665638425419776
Watch this protest go from “f*ck the police” to “call the police” in seconds:
_____________________________________________________
Had to share this one. Stupid little punks messed with the wrong guy.
> The disagreement about military was, from what it looks like to me, a show disagreement.
You are, of course, correct. It’s all for show.
-SB
ThanQ so much for posting that.
Try reading this and it falls into place.
The disagreement about military was, from what it looks like to me, a show disagreement. (Leaving Mattis out of the picture, he’s not in the administration anyway!)
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3851914/posts?page=288#288
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Actually, you linked Brian Cates once again directly contradicting Q content (and usefulness) by replacing it with his own counter theories.
Q is using the word “mutiny” and indicating severe threat, therefore, Brian insists it’s a harmless show.
Where have we seen this before? Q says Mueller and RR are dirty consistently in numerous, detailed drops; Cates claims they are heroes in many, many long detailed threads - and is later proven absolutely wrong.
Q is sounding the alarm - the National Guard is being pushed pushed out of DC as 1 million enemies are heading in to “protest” at the WHite House. Brian Cates says we shouldn’t take it seriously - it’s a show.
Why keep directing FReeQs to read Brian Cates instead of Q in order to understand what’s going on?