Need to revisit - here we go again. This time I am putting the translation of part of it in text (which may differ slightly from the video translation):
Luc Montagnier HIV Nobel Prize Winner Says Virus "Bio-engineered" in Lab 黄艳玲
BTW those chinese letters at the end of the title. They say HuangYanling
Some of the dialogue<
Show host:
So what I’m interested in this morning is, you’re working on the virus right now.
Nobel Price winning Doctor Luc Montagnier:
I’m working, but not necessarily in the lab. Work is done on the computer with a colleague and then that’s it. We don’t do experiments, but we collect data from the disease itself, from all the measurements that are being done in the labs right now on the patients.
Show host:
—And you came to certain conclusions.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
So, you could say that I came to the conclusion that there actually has been manipulation done on this virus.
Show host:
What do you mean?
DR. Luc: —Well, some of it, I’m not saying all of it, y’know. There’s a part which is obviously the classic virus and there’s another mainly coming from the bat, but that part has added sequences, particularly from HIV. The AIDS virus.
Host:
But when you say added, who added it?
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
I don’t know. — It’s not natural, is that what you mean? No, it’s not natural. It was a professional job. It was a job for molecular biologists. It’s a very meticulous job.
You could say clockwork of sequences.
Host:
So, with what goal?
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
It’s not clear what the goal is. I’m not exposing it. If you like, my job is to expose the facts, that’s all. I’m not accusing anyone. I don’t know who did it or why.
There is a possibility that maybe they wanted to make —we don’t know who “they” are — but they wanted to make an AIDS vaccine.
So a small sequence of the virus is taken and put into the larger coronavirus sequence.
Host:
I’m not sure, I’m not sure I understand what you’re saying. You mean, in this virus, there’s a bit of HIV.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
—That’s it. The genetic material of the virus is a long ribbon of RNA, correct? Like DNA, except it’s RNA and in this long ribbon at a certain place someone placed a small sequences of HIV and this small sequence isn’t small like insignificant; they have the possibility of modifying, for example, something called antigenic sites. That means, if we want to make a vaccine, we can very well modify the protein for the vaccine by adding a small sequence from another virus.
Host:
—Are you certain? Because I think that was a rumour, that it had human origin after all and it was then refuted by most scientific authorities anyway.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
There’s still a willingness to stifle it. If we’re working on it, and we’re weren’t the first. A very, very, very famous Indian research group had published the same thing and they were forced to retract it. Host:
So how were they going to force them to retract it?
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
By cancellation, if you look at their obligations, you can see big block of cancellations because…
Host:
Then what you’re saying here is that most scientists are just saying otherwise anyway.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
—More or less. More or less. Look, this happened at the beginning of the year and we’re seeing more and more evidence that suggests this.
You see, I’m aged out. I’m a Nobel Prize winner and I can work freely. So there’s no pressure on me to do anything.
Here's the Paper again: Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag
Could the version of Covid-19 that got released be an intermediate version that was the only version remaining after more advanced and lethal versions were destroyed by white hats? My mind keeps going back to that “training exercise” in L.A. (was it last year or 2018?) where a building was stormed. I mean, we’re finding out now how much less lethal the virus is than what was originally thought. Could a more advanced and more lethal version have been confiscated in the L.A. raid, leaving the DS with no choice but to go with the less lethal virus we see today and to try use misinformation and propaganda to make up for what this intermediate version lacked in lethality?
Host:
—Are you certain? Because I think that was a rumour, that it had human origin after all and it was then refuted by most scientific authorities anyway.
Doctor Luc Montagnier:
There’s still a willingness to stifle it. If we’re working on it, and we’re weren’t the first. A very, very, very famous Indian research group had published the same thing and they were forced to retract it. Host:
So how were they going to force them to retract it?
*******************************************************************************
Yep, I remember that article Zero Hedge and Great Game India, IIRC, had posted and retracted it. Also several Twitter posts disappeared down the memory hole and some Tweeties were banned for chirping that song.