Some stuff that I’m not able to resolve:
1. Q has repeated and consistently said to “trust Sessions” and that he will be vindicated as a hero. We know he started many investigations that continue completely out of public view (as they should), including the 27 leak investigations, the one into Epstein and those being conducted by Huber and Durham.
2. Trump has periodically tweeted comments critical of Sessions performance as AG, primarily his recusal, and most recently about how he let our country down and can’t be trusted, and that’s why he endorses Tuberville.
3. The common factor is the word “trust”. Q repeatedly says “Trust Sessions” and Potus says “Alabama do not trust Jeff Sessions”. Is there a difference, i.e. is Trump sending a message specifically to Alabama voters and if so, why?
4. Why did Trump send the same tweet about Sessions twice on 22 May, just over 3 hours apart? I don’t recall that happening before, at least not often. Just a mistake?
5. When Potus says “do not trust” and “let our country down”, how do you reconcile those words with Q’s admonition to “trust” and “will be vindicated as a hero”?
Prior to the 5/22 tweets I was of the opinion both Q and Potus could be right - Sessions could be a hero without Trump explicitly praising or endorsing him. Now it’s harder for me to rationalize these two views in any way other than “deception is sometimes necessary”. Does anyone have a better theory?
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said the “biggest mistake” of his presidency was picking Jeff Sessions for attorney general.
In an interview that aired Sunday morning on “Meet the Press,” host Chuck Todd asked Trump, “If you could have one do-over as president, what would it be?”
To which Trump replied, “It would be personnel,” before lashing out at his former attorney general.
“I would say if I had one do-over, it would be, I would not have appointed Jeff Sessions to be attorney general. That would be my one ... that was the biggest mistake.”
It’s not the first time Trump has openly criticized the former attorney general.
Trump fired Sessions as attorney general the day after the 2018 midterm elections, ending a year of open criticism. Trump had been incensed by Sessions’ recusal from overseeing the Mueller investigation and railed against the former Alabama senator as “beleaguered” and “disgraceful,” and he expressed “disappointment” in him.
The president told The New York Times in July 2017 that he would not have appointed Sessions if he had known Sessions would have recused himself.
In September 2018, Trump went so far as to tell Hill.TV: “I don’t have an attorney general. It’s very sad.”
Contributing: Kevin Johnson
Imho the reason Trump is villifying Sessions in a very uncharateristic manner is optics for derps. Why? The only reason I can think is becausce Sessions has another role and needs to appear not to be Trump’s lapdog. Or if Sessions does become the Senator, he also does not look like Trump’s lapdog and makes his “own decisions”.
Q+ praised Sessions and thanked him for his sacrfices. It makes absolutely not sense that Trump would praise him then, and villify him now, other than fog of war for the derps.
Re:Sessions I was of the opinion both Q and Potus could be right.
_________________________________________________________
I even considered that maybe POTUS and Q were referring to different people named Sessions, i.e. Jeff Sessions and Pete Sessions. So I went diving, but wasn’t able to find anything about Pete Sessions that would suggest he’s the one Q is referring to.
Pete Sessions (R) was an 11-term congressman from Texas who was not re-elected in 2018. He’s running for the Senate this year.
While the disparity in comments suggests there are two Sessions, I couldn’t find anything in the record that would suggest that Pete is the one Q wants us to trust.