Re:Sessions I was of the opinion both Q and Potus could be right.
_________________________________________________________
I even considered that maybe POTUS and Q were referring to different people named Sessions, i.e. Jeff Sessions and Pete Sessions. So I went diving, but wasn’t able to find anything about Pete Sessions that would suggest he’s the one Q is referring to.
Pete Sessions (R) was an 11-term congressman from Texas who was not re-elected in 2018. He’s running for the Senate this year.
While the disparity in comments suggests there are two Sessions, I couldn’t find anything in the record that would suggest that Pete is the one Q wants us to trust.
When ]SESSIONS[ left office there was a quote from Q+ that specifically identified Jeff Sessions and thanked him for his service. Sessions was specifically setup by deep state when they had him come to a meeting setup by Hussein admin that included Russian ambassador which then lead to the “collusion” allegation against him as well. IMO Sessions *had* to recuse himself because (a) the Mule op (or whatever else may have served that role outside McCabe’s demand he lead the anti-Trump effort) and (b) SESSIONS needed to run the counter-intel op that he then tasked to Durham + Huber, etc.. Thus SESSIONS is a witness in two ways - to attest to what authorities he gave (or did not give) to RR on the one side and “white hats” on the other as well as the false charge of “collusion” which was contrived by deep state, just like they did with the others ala Flynn etc.