That’s what I consider, not even so much “not winning” but not looking looking like “Trump’s lapdog”.
The idea that Sessions is now “bad” is ridiculous. Seriously.
Some stuff that I’m not able to resolve:
1. Q has repeated and consistently said to “trust Sessions” and that he will be vindicated as a hero. We know he started many investigations that continue completely out of public view (as they should), including the 27 leak investigations, the one into Epstein and those being conducted by Huber and Durham.
2. Trump has periodically tweeted comments critical of Sessions performance as AG, primarily his recusal, and most recently about how he let our country down and can’t be trusted, and that’s why he endorses Tuberville.
3. The common factor is the word “trust”. Q repeatedly says “Trust Sessions” and Potus says “Alabama do not trust Jeff Sessions”. Is there a difference, i.e. is Trump sending a message specifically to Alabama voters and if so, why?
4. Why did Trump send the same tweet about Sessions twice on 22 May, just over 3 hours apart? I don’t recall that happening before, at least not often. Just a mistake?
5. When Potus says “do not trust” and “let our country down”, how do you reconcile those words with Q’s admonition to “trust” and “will be vindicated as a hero”?
Prior to the 5/22 tweets I was of the opinion both Q and Potus could be right - Sessions could be a hero without Trump explicitly praising or endorsing him. Now it’s harder for me to rationalize these two views in any way other than “deception is sometimes necessary”. Does anyone have a better theory?
Portraying Sessions all of a sudden as a "heel" is straight out of pro wrasslin'.