I do. Ignore this nonsense. If any of these dopes had ever taken a physics class they would have learned the inverse square law for electromagnetic fields. That is, the field strength decreases with the square of the distance.
It’s extra-dumb to be worried about 5G as if it’s something new, when the same frequencies being used for 5G have been used in the past for other things, including TV broadcasts, microwave links, and other data transmissions. Because of that, if 5G is unsafe, it means that we’ve been using “unsafe” frequencies for decades. Considering there hasn’t been an observed rise in cancer rates, it’s clear that these radio waves have no impact on human health.
In short, if you think of this 5G Nonsense as having been brought to you by the same people who brought us the Climate Science Nonsense and now the Coronavirus Science Nonsense, you won’t be far from wrong. And you can use the same shovel to scoop up any of it.
> 5G
My brother in law works for an electonics firm that does work for the military. They work with 5G tech. The weaponized form of 5G everyone yells about is extremely concentrated. The non-weaponized form is very distributed/scattered, which is why 5G range is very short. If 5G caused cancer and all of this shiff he’d be dead by now. He’s 110% healthy.
-SB
People who live near wind farms have problems. The vibration. Even when it’s not audible.
EMF or whatever it is, and microves like from cell towers, definitely can affect people adversely. Some more than others, and proximity/distance too.
Technology can often damage, care should be taken. Will it be done carefully? I doubt it.
Whether 5G does all that stuff I have no idea. Example - if I use cell phone, that side of my head gets hot and feels burning. Same with cordless, I have to use headset. Even then on a long call I feel some burning. That is the EMF I think it’s called. All electrical energy affects the body one way or another (think electrocution...), so why wouldn’t 5G affect the body?
DH watched a youtube about a Canadian research project that found very bad stuff about cell phones kept close to the body. Will that research be made public? Who knows. plenty of modern invetions have dark sides. What about pesticides, for instance? My life was almost ruined with a pesticide poisoning (done by someone else).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#5g... Here's what you should understand - then think about:
That "flashy trash" "5G" graphic (by scamsters selling worthless RF meters) is another dumb@$$3d pseudoscience phony scare. (As if Gorebull Wahruming isn't enough...)
Only the ignorant who have zero grasp of electromagnetic physics fear 5G.
See "Skin Effect": The shorter the wavelength, the shallower the penetration.
5G frequencies (far shorter wavelength than current celular signals) cannot penetrate more than 0.4 mm.
How is that going to affect all that deep physiological garbage in that stupid scare graphic?
The only perceptible 5G frequency RF effect is very shallow surface heating of the epidermis.
Actual example: to get enough 5G frequency heating to be objectionable (with zero injury) requires 100,000 watts -- focused into a square meter of area -- by a monster rig like this "Active Area Denial System":
Those big "boxes" contain massive (100,000 watt) diesel generators. Any cellular system consuming only a fraction of that power per tranceiver would black out the entire USA...
Remember -- cellular transmissions (to ensure wide coverage are NOT FOCUSED. (See "inverse square" and "inverses cube" laws...)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The (imaginary) risk from current cellular frequencies is at least an order of magnitude higher. Are you hurting in any of the listed ways, now?
The risk of damage from getting into a car that's been sitting in the sun is many orders of magnitude greater.
>SLIDE OVER<...
(Physical chemist -- SMH...)
TXnMA
