I do. Ignore this nonsense. If any of these dopes had ever taken a physics class they would have learned the inverse square law for electromagnetic fields. That is, the field strength decreases with the square of the distance.
It’s extra-dumb to be worried about 5G as if it’s something new, when the same frequencies being used for 5G have been used in the past for other things, including TV broadcasts, microwave links, and other data transmissions. Because of that, if 5G is unsafe, it means that we’ve been using “unsafe” frequencies for decades. Considering there hasn’t been an observed rise in cancer rates, it’s clear that these radio waves have no impact on human health.
In short, if you think of this 5G Nonsense as having been brought to you by the same people who brought us the Climate Science Nonsense and now the Coronavirus Science Nonsense, you won’t be far from wrong. And you can use the same shovel to scoop up any of it.
:)
Re: “... this 5G nonsense ...”
You’re right that the technology has been used for awhile now. The dangers may be in increasing the proliferation of all the new base stations that will be needed support the technology for our pervasive hand-held device use.
My understanding is that high-frequency radio waves have a shorter range than lower-frequency waves, meaning many more stations will be required to allow data to travel the short distances necessary for the speed 5G enables. In areas of dense network usage, there could be hundreds more stations, each sending out way more radio waves than we experience now from existing TV, radio and microwave transmissions.
There’s some evidence that excessive amounts of these high frequency waves are disruptive to all life at the cellular level, including plants. Much like vaccines, I think there needs to be more study of the potential impacts of RF-EMFs that we’re exposed to before they make it so and then see the negative effects. No amount of “Oops” can correct the damage at that point.
The short answer is, no one really knows yet, but one of the signs that it may not be good for us is that WHO says 5G is safe. As we all know now, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest funder of WHO, and we also know their goals of depopulation through whatever means necessary and possible. If 5G can destroy or weaken humans at the cellular level, that’s one more tool they and their minions will vigorously support.