How many FILES do you have, TEXOKIE???
Posted on 05/17/2020 10:59:11 AM PDT by ransomnote
No doubt members of the media are heavily invested in the vaccine. It appears they are going to loose BIG $$$ on this one.
Discovery phase continues ... I’m not sure when the next hearing date is.
Trump threatens to hold back funding to states over ‘rogue’ moves on mail-in voting
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-threatens-to-hold-back-funding-over-michigan-mail-in-voting
President Trump is threatening to withhold federal funding from Michigan and Nevada over their decisions to enact widespread mail-in voting in the upcoming election, claiming the moves were “done illegally” and will lead to voter fraud.
Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson announced Tuesday that all registered voters in the crucial general election battleground state will be mailed an application to vote by mail in November so they do not have to risk exposure to the coronavirus by going out to the polls.
How many FILES do you have, TEXOKIE???
Re Three Families:
One has to consider the Windsors.
The House of Windsor came into being in 1917, when the name was adopted as the British Royal Family’s official name by a proclamation of King George V, replacing the historic name of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. It remains the family name of the current Royal Family.
In 1901, the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (a branch of the House of Wettin) succeeded the House of Hanover to the British monarchy with the accession of King Edward VII, son of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
The House of Wettin is a dynasty of German counts, dukes, prince-electors and kings that once ruled territories in the present-day German states of Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia. The dynasty is one of the oldest in Europe, and its origins can be traced back to the town of Wettin, Saxony-Anhalt. The Wettins gradually rose to power within the Holy Roman Empire. Members of the family became the rulers of several medieval states, starting with the Saxon Eastern March in 1030. Other states they gained were Meissen in 1089, Thuringia in 1263, and Saxony in 1423. These areas cover large parts of Central Germany as a cultural area of Germany.
BARACK could be the QUEEN and HILLARY the KING.
BARACK
Barak, also spelled Baraq, is a given name of Semitic origin. As a Hebrew name, from the root B-R-Q, it means "lightning" and it appears in the Hebrew Bible as the name of an Ancient Israelite general Barak
BIBLICAL STORY concerning BARACK..
The story of the Hebrews' defeat of the Canaanites led by Sisera, under the prophetic leadership of Deborah and the military leadership of Barak, is related in prose (Judges Chapter 4) and repeated in poetry (Chapter 5, which is known as the Song of Deborah).
Chapter 4 makes the chief enemy Jabin, king of Hazor (present Tell el-Qedah, about three miles southwest of Hula Basin), though a prominent part is played by his commander-in-chief, Sisera of Harosheth-ha-goiim (possibly Tell el-'Amr, approximately 12 miles (19 km) northwest of Megiddo).
Deborah summoned Barak, the son of Abinoam, from his home at Kedesh in Naphtali, and ordered him, in the name of YHWH, to take ten thousand men to Mount Tabor. He agreed to on condition that Deborah should go with him. Here he was attacked, as Deborah had expected, by Sisera, whose forces were put to flight, and the greater part of them were slain by Barak's army.
Because Barak would not go to battle without Deborah, the honor of victory did not go to him, but rather to "a woman" (Judges 4:9). Most authorities believe this passage refers to Jael's killing of Sisera in her tent following the battle, while others believe this refers to Deborah herself.
Wow.
Jack PoS reported yesterday but I’ve not seen elsewhere - POTUS told Senate Republicans yesterday that 3 of his children were unmasked on Inaugural day 2017. This gets to what Devin Nunes previously reported that the unmaskings did NOT have anything to do with “Russia”
Incredible story.
45 says 1917 just about everyday.
Citing criminal investigation, Ghislaine Maxwell seeks delay in Jeffrey Epstein victim’s lawsuit
Menninger asked a federal judge to freeze a lawsuit brought by alleged Epstein victim Annie Farmer due to the investigation by federal prosecutors in New York. Farmer claims that both Epstein and Maxwell sexually abused her at the multimillionaire sex offender’s New Mexico ranch. Farmer seeks damages from Maxwell and Epstein’s $634 million estate.
“The U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York has publicly and repeatedly announced its ‘ongoing’ criminal investigation into alleged Epstein ‘co-conspirators’ on the same topic as [Farmer] alleges in this case,” Menninger wrote in a letter last week.
So close to taking America out forever.
Infiltrated instead of invaded.
Tom Hanks just gets weirder and weirder. It shows you how good the movie makers are that they can create a public image of this freak as “Joe Every Guy.”
>> Why did POTUS reply to a tweet from May 30, 2019?
Could it be related to the reason we don’t have a new thread yet?
Hey, ransomnote! I’m not complaining. Just hoping it’s a sign of something big coming!
Situation sure has been heating up lately, hasn’t it?
Q, why ya gotta make me look at Hannity?
Not under current law, and Mil intel doesn't do 'investigations' domestically or law enforcement roles. They function as collectors and analysts. MI's role is to support operations, without operations current or planned there is no focus for the MI's collection efforts. Military intel does collect on strategic objectives and produces products for future ops that may or may not ever be undertaken, targeting and Order of Battle (OOB) for instance all the time. When the operations is 'on', the planners obviously want to know how current the intel is and the reason for the confidence level of the of the collectors/analysts (sources/methods).
In the military no one is worried about proving a case. All they want is a successful op (meeting mission objectives/minimizing risk to friendly forces.)
The objectives of military and LE operations aren't really compatible as the outcomes aren't accomplished in the same manner, nor are the legal precepts governing them the same .
The FBI when it operated legally and properly has different priorities than the military does. Changing the way the mil does intel to support LE efforts (assuming the law changes) would hamper its real mission which needs to be focused on current/potential conflicts.
Nothing screws up domestic operations in support of LE more than the introduction of a lawyer. The Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) is the legal guidance for historical military operations and all planners and executors of those plans do or should know those constraints/restraints.
Q story in Germany
Under the picture it says "Q does not take Adrenochrome" (literally Mr. Q swallows no Adrenochrome.) WUT?
https://www.welt.de/kultur/plus208074207/Deep-State-Der-Kult-um-Q-und-seine-deutschen-Juenger.html?cid=onsite.onsitesearch
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.