Skip to comments.
Vanity - CARES Act (responds to the COVID-19) was introduced 01/24/2019?
Congress ^
| 5/13/20
| Self
Posted on 05/13/2020 10:52:47 AM PDT by the anti-liberal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Insight is appreciated, thanks!
To: the anti-liberal
2
posted on
05/13/2020 10:53:42 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: the anti-liberal
How is it that none of Republican “representatives” brought this up???
3
posted on
05/13/2020 10:54:30 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: the anti-liberal
It was basically amended on top of this bill:
Introduced in House (01/24/2019)
Middle Class Health Benefits Tax Repeal Act of 2019
This bill repeals the excise tax on employer-sponsored health care coverage for which there is an excess benefit (high-cost plans). The repeal applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
4
posted on
05/13/2020 10:54:46 AM PDT
by
struggle
To: the anti-liberal
It’s almost like the Rats planned this.
5
posted on
05/13/2020 10:56:19 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Tyrants don't just give you your freedoms back. You have to take them.)
To: struggle
Thought it might be something like that, but didn’t know how to find out. Thanks!
To: struggle
Shame on you! You’re ruining some FReepers conspiracy theories before they can even get up some steam.
7
posted on
05/13/2020 10:57:37 AM PDT
by
Artemis Webb
(There are only two genders.)
To: the anti-liberal
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (H.R. 748),[1] also known as the CARES Act,[2] is a law meant to address the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. In its original form, it was introduced in the United States Congress as H.R. 748 (Middle Class Health Benefits Tax Repeal Act of 2019) by Joe Courtney (D-CT) on January 24, 2019[a] although the bill was amended before it was passed.
8
posted on
05/13/2020 10:58:52 AM PDT
by
jackibutterfly
(My mind is wandering, and I'm following it!)
To: the anti-liberal
>Thought it might be something like that, but didnt know how to find out. Thanks!
Well, they amended the bill because it had been passed in both the house and senate, then sent to the house for editing and repassage. They want this bill to go through as quickly as possible without debate, because a lot of it is benefits for illegal immigrants and blue state bailouts, AND AMNESTY.
9
posted on
05/13/2020 10:59:06 AM PDT
by
struggle
To: Artemis Webb
"Shame on you! Youre ruining some FReepers conspiracy theories before they can even get up some steam." I am, too, I guess. ;-) Sorry. I found it in Wikipedia.
10
posted on
05/13/2020 11:00:59 AM PDT
by
jackibutterfly
(My mind is wandering, and I'm following it!)
To: struggle
It was basically amended on top of this bill: Introduced in House (01/24/2019)
Middle Class Health Benefits Tax Repeal Act of 2019
This.
The bill above was passed by the House and amended. This bypasses all of the House Committee hearings, and speeds up the bill process compared to starting with a whole new bill.
It's the same process used to pass the ObamaCare bill. A bill that was passed by the House was amended in the Senate to the point that the entire text and title were struck and replaced with ObamaCare language.
11
posted on
05/13/2020 11:01:07 AM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Artemis Webb
It still makes for a good conspiracy theory if the Dems use the date to make it look like it took Trump a year to respond to the virus. The Dem base won’t see through it.
12
posted on
05/13/2020 11:02:17 AM PDT
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: the anti-liberal
The bill was introduced on an unrelated matter, but on March 25, 2020, the Senate replaced its text in whole with the stimulus bill.
13
posted on
05/13/2020 11:05:56 AM PDT
by
jjotto
(“Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.”)
To: the anti-liberal
Senate Republicans did what Senate Democrats did to get Obamacare - they took an existing House revenue bill and amended it to gut its original content but still call it a House-originated revenue bill.
-PJ
14
posted on
05/13/2020 11:08:55 AM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: jjotto
That was the only thing I could think of, but I didn’t know how to find out - but thanks to you guys I now know!
To: the anti-liberal
Jan 2019 ???!!???
WHAT THE @#$_& ???!!!???
16
posted on
05/13/2020 11:14:32 AM PDT
by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)
To: Artemis Webb
17
posted on
05/13/2020 11:15:17 AM PDT
by
WildHighlander57
((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)
To: the anti-liberal
The House bill original text was totally unrelated. The Senate used this house-passed bill as a form only vehicle, and put in entirely new language in March 2020.
18
posted on
05/13/2020 11:19:56 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: the anti-liberal
Congress never introduces new stuff. Its all built upon existing legislation.
You guys need to lighten up on the conspiracy stuff. They are mostly stupid...not evil.
To: Blood of Tyrants
20
posted on
05/13/2020 11:34:21 AM PDT
by
dirtymac
(Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.(DT4POTUS))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson