Oh, I know. I was just breakin' his ovum.
I wouldn't gay marry him for all the tea in heathen China.
Dumb people do amuse me, though.
Oh, I know. I was just breakin' his ovum.
I wouldn't gay marry him for all the tea in heathen China.
Dumb people do amuse me, though.
Not as amused as our President Tweeting "Obamagate" at the request of Anons in the QResearch forum, I'll bet...
~Easy
I think there are times when folks jump on the thread and claim they need proof of this or that. Or Barr and Durham aren’t going hold anyone accountable. For me, it’s not able who, Q has answered that question to my satifaction, the real question is when and who will be in the top five.
I see Dave W wanting proof and I think to myself he is either new to Q or he isn’t down the funnel far enough. I wasn’t with Q on the first post, but found Q in the four hundreds and had to catch up. The information I have learned over the years is astonishing But it’s been years at this point, years of daily reading and learning. And learning from the folks here, way too many folks to list.
Back to proof. Sometimes proof is the work you do yourself. We are far along to type out why believe certain people will end up in prison. Who wants to type all of that, Q makes a good case, one just need to dive in the the Q posts and come up with their own comclusions. Then we can argue about “who’s on first”.
What is not constructive is picking a fight with Bags. Bags buys ink by the barrel, has the sharpest of wits and a salty tongue when pushed. And is generally loved here on these pages. We have come to accustomed to his style and look foward to his perspective on Q post. Pick a fight with Bags a your own peril. His hands are lighting quick and he has a devastating right.
Well, you can take all the tea in Chinee
Out it in a big, brown, paper-bag, for me.
Sail it right round the seven oceans
Dump it, smack-dab to the bottom of the deep blue sea
Because...