To: nanetteclaret
See my post 493 upthread.
That “warning” would be moot.
For 2 reasons (1) 18USC242 is the purview of the DOJ Fedzilla, not in Paxton’s arena. (2) The State regulates business, 18USC242 protect civil rights.
Luther was re-opening her *business* against the orders (without permission).
There are plenty of “shall not operate” rules in effect in every day business.
The emergency order was another.
510 posted on
05/07/2020 6:19:50 AM PDT by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Scatology is serendipitous)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
So what youre saying is that individuals do not have the right to work without the states blessing? There is something wrong with that picture! Her civil rights have been violated. If they keep the abortuaries open, then her business should be able to be open, too. She is being discriminated against!
518 posted on
05/07/2020 6:36:03 AM PDT by
nanetteclaret
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
I used the wrong example. Gov. Abbott did close the abortuaries. But I still think she is being discrimated against. She is white and her salon is in North Dallas. The judge is black. If it had been Tanikas Salon in South Dallas, I expect they would have looked the other way.
524 posted on
05/07/2020 7:01:08 AM PDT by
nanetteclaret
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
To: Cletus.D.Yokel
569 posted on
05/07/2020 8:48:48 AM PDT by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson