Posted on 05/06/2020 9:14:04 AM PDT by ransomnote
Link
https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1258525297042833408
mark
.999 to infinity is not 1.000 to infinity, its an incongruity and noted as such in math texts.
Is that akin to where the ‘proof’ that 2 + 2 can sometimes = 5 comes in? I don’t remember. I understood it at the time in class decades ago but it has faded in clarity.
I am sure the spying started before early 2016. But that much we can prove NOW. I think Obie was spying using The Hammer since 2008.
It's good to hear that you have dem friends that are not too far gone. Friends that are apolitical have been sending me links to Mikovits interviews on FB, it's gone viral (no pun intended).
That's my thinking.
#1456 Hopefully Schitthead is arrested for leaking classified information.
Like Don Jr’s closed door testimony when shiff had to go drop a little one and CNN all of a sudden started reporting what was happening in the questioning.
Oh how I hope there was a FISA tap on that rat bastard. Remember there has been a Leak team conducting investigation for a year or two now.
Hey lil Adam, BOOM!
Ya’ll still getting Praying Medic as the first response to these tweets?
The point of posting the remote viewing video was to point out the similarities to Q. And remove viewing is in no way controversial. It’s been proven time and time again by governments all over the world. And it is NOT ESP - totally different.
AFFF (spoken as A-triple-F) = Aqueous Film Forming Foam
or
PPK - Purple Potassium Power
or
CO2 - Carbon Dioxide
Used in the USN circa 40 years ago for Class D (burnable metals) fires.
We probably have some new solutions that don't use water.
i, j, and x are float variables.
i = 2.4; j = 2.4;
x = (i + j);
print int(i) "+" int(j) "=" int(x);
The printer spits out "2 + 2 = 5"
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
FYI it appears the “redacted” deposition transcript released yesterday is Michael Gaeta, Steele’s handler
Case Agent 1 is cited in the IG report as being primarily responsible for some of the most significant errors in the FBIs surveillance of the Trump campaign. The New York Times has reported him to be Stephen Somma, a counterintelligence investigator from the New York field office.
Steeles primary FBI handler, Handling Agent 1, has been identified in multiple news reports over the years as Michael Gaeta, an FBI legal attaché in Rome. Steele met with Gaeta on July 5, 2016, and provided him the first two memos from his dossier. Gaeta also arranged and attended an Oct. 3, 2016, meeting with Steele and a group of FBI agents.
There is a video from On Point Preparedness and Steve Bancarz which is a critique of Dr. Mikovits interview on Plandemic. Bancarz points out the New Age beliefs of Mikki Willis, the interviewer. The wacky Mikki Willis may well be a huge distraction from the facts. However, Bancarz makes a couple of passing references to QAnon insinuating the connection to Willis and New Age and people looking for the light which is a false light. He has it wrong but the reason he is concerned he says is so many of his family that would usually never believe in conspiracy theories have have shared that video. While it is true that people can be deceived into following a wrong path, this issue with Dr. Misovits has nothing to do with that. The Great Awakening which he must think is religion, is more an awareness of truth and how we have been manipulated. That may well direct people to see the real Truth, Jesus Christ. Have any of you seen his video?
He was 64......thats not short
You note in your post it’s not related to Q. Persons performing remote viewing can simply read Q and then “remote view” whatever they want. Posting remote viewing content hear muddies the comms and can imply to noobs that they must adopt an understanding of same to understand Q, which is not true.
Wikipedia:
“There is no scientific evidence that remote viewing exists, and the topic of remote viewing is generally regarded as pseudoscience. Typically a remote viewer is expected to give information about an object, event, person or location that is hidden from physical view and separated at some distance.”
Please post remote viewing content in the forum, if Jim Rob permits it to be posted to FR at all.
BOOKMARK: Grenell has released the (real/source) House Intel Committee transcripts:
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/features/2753-53-hpsci-transcripts
Please go no further in this discussion.
It's been almost 50 years since my last grad school Advanced Math seminar and even the memory makes me vertiginous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.