Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: stylin19a

Was always looking for Contreras name on the Page FISA ... but he wasn’t on that one but that means he’s probably on another.


721 posted on 05/04/2020 3:29:52 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 709 | View Replies ]


To: Steven W.; bagster

Let me finish my thought, here.

If the scenario is the Holder\Contreras\Covington|Flynn Lawyers recusal...there would be no reason to keep that secret.

if it’s as Steven W. surmises and it’s FISA...FISA is secret and has to be kept secret.

Time to get at it.


726 posted on 05/04/2020 3:37:15 PM PDT by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies ]

To: Steven W.

Not on the 4 intended to target Trump campaign but how about others during that time span?
And, did they benefit the investigations of one Peter Strzok.

Keep in mind, also, that the FISC judges were known to each other and likely communicated “socially” with each other. IYKWIM


761 posted on 05/04/2020 4:45:48 PM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Scatology is serendipitous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 721 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson