Posted on 05/03/2020 10:28:05 AM PDT by Conserv
Thanks Cboldt!!
I’ve said before, Trump should (as the incumbent) insist on no debates. That means the media will demand Joe debate and fall right into the trap.
But the second thing Trump should insist on is that the news media be recused from the debates entirely. The questions should be asked alternatively from Tom Perez and Rona McDaniel. The media has proven they will not be fair. With the DNC and RNC chairs doing the questioning, at least they’ll be seen as partisan from the beginning.
I never actually studied Latin in school but I've lived long enough to have picked up a bit knowledge of it for appropriate situations. I appreciate your tagline too my FRiend, GMTA!
Fortunately no one is forced to look at her although she does pop up on occasion on the election night media meltdown compilations. The only time she is tolerable.
Not sure if it matters but someone on another thread said DC threw out almost all statute of limitations a couple of years ago.
well, when she got her start here she was Martha Bradlee. Her father in law was famous leftist editor and bum kisser of all Dem politicians, Ben Bradlee.
I was interviewed by her in the late 80s. She’s about 5’0 tall and had a permanent scowl on her face. Thankfully I haven’t watched Fake News in years so I never see the likes of her or fellow hags like Andrea Mitchell, Judy Woodruff, et al
RAT FACE is the PERFECT DEMOCRAT...MEAN AND UGLY AND STUPID!
You forgot to mention the excruciatingly UGLY sound of her voice.
Here's darling Martha, apparently in the rarified air of, sniff-sniff, pre-show jitters.
Ronna McDaniel DESTROYED ugly leftwing witch Martha Raddatz.
The lovely MARTHA RADDATZ
I don’t watch these programs because of the progressive and biased hosts. And then you have weak kneed Republicans that are not up to the task of defending, let alone attacking. Occasionally, I’ll take a peak at a thread like this just to see what’s going on. Today, I am pleasantly surprised. That was an outstanding, absolutely excellent performance.
I’ve now heard varying reports....several have said that digital penetration is indeed considered “rape” and a felony. So if the alleged assault is governed by DC Statutes, that type of felony assault would fall under a Statute that extends for 30 years...it allegedly occurred in 1993, giving Tara Reade three more years??? I’m not an attorney, I just play one to my family....LOL
I am so pleased to report that, having not watched any of the “C’s” networks now for 30 plus years, I had not ever heard of Raddatz until this posting.
You’ve been fortunate. Your mental health thanks you. :)
The questions should be asked alternatively from Tom Perez and Rona McDaniel. The media has proven they will not be fair. With the DNC and RNC chairs doing the questioning, at least theyll be seen as partisan from the beginning.”
That would be an excellent debate format. Thanks for posting.
Rape, yes. I remember reading about the crime of rape, in the UCMJ as a young sailor. Penetration, however slight, constitutes the offense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.