[stylin19a]

The FBI’s sole intent was to first ask Michael Flynn about a conversation with a Russian and what was in that tapped conversation, and if admitted to that conversation, then they would attempt to trip him up in a lie, in order to entrap him, which is exactly what they did.

SCOTUS ruled a long time again LEO can trick people.
Frazier v. Cupp.

I'm guessing it includes the Feds. Here are other cases re: deception may or may not apply to Flynn:
https://www.policeone.com/legal/articles/case-law-on-police-deception-VuP9C033StWR83T4/

We only have to look to Scooter Libby to how the Feds can catch you in a lie - misremembering things.

I don't think this is the slam-dunk people think...unless Judge Sullivan feels he was sandbagged. Remember, Sullivan's only job was to pronounce sentence.

[christianbasque]

I don’t think this is the slam-dunk people think...unless Judge Sullivan feels he was sandbagged. Remember, Sullivan’s only job was to pronounce sentence.
*******************************
You may be right stylin but I hope you’re not.

[Jumper]

Tricking a subject is not the same as investigating a fake crime and trying to prosecute said fake crime.

[Billyv]

I don’t think this is the slam-dunk people think...unless Judge Sullivan feels he was sandbagged. Remember, Sullivan’s only job was to pronounce sentence.
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Sullivan can’t rule for Flynn because Sullivan is also a player in the DS game, IMO!

WWG1WGA!