According to that screen shot StevenW posted of they guy that originally posted it back in 2017, he took a screen shot, which lends me to believe he took a screen shot of the live convo. I don't know if a gamer would have access to archived chats.
I am the least computer savvy dude out there, but I'm not buying the 'o I accidently fell into this private invitation only chat room. Also, look at the upper right hand corner. It says, 'Dooku joined the group'. Likely it would show that message any time somebody new joined the group.
So wouldn't inadvertent gamer's name show up just the same way when he stumbled in? And wouldn't a roomful of people who were having a super secret convo notice something like that? If so, why would they continue talking?
I dunno. Its all very mysterious to me and maybe above my pay grade.
But I like to play pretend spy when I'm bored. I like to think that the Q people put this out there with plausible deniability.
How do you get evidence into the record?
On the gamer chat image from May 2017, my speculation is Q and company let this out now because they have it all after and before this chat date and of course like up thread it might flush the traitors out.
Good points. Sounds very plausible.
I was basing my thought on my experience with “Skype for Business” archives.
There are time markers in the transcript indicating when slackers joined.
This helps in “attendance tracking” for those micromanagers everyone despises.
Slide: No real heat on the Flubros yet. Good info on Canada.
as far as stumbling into a private chat, you are right that the possibility of that happening is a ‘bridge too far’...glitches can happen, but for the moment, let’s assume no glitch occurred
what you’re left with are two possibilities...
- disinformation from the DS (not likely)
- white hats listening in (we have it all)
probably other angles I’m missing, but just my thoughts on that