Replies

one thing you will notice / have noticed is that many of the open source things that “Q” highlights are covered on these threads before they’re linked by “Q” ... does “Q” linking to something dismiss or increase its relevance? The RATs obviously hope to eliminate any scrutiny of anything particularly the things + people that “Q” highlights. As I’ve always said to “Q” skeptics, answer the questions! So many don’t want to think for themselves and won’t / don’t do the due diligence that people on these threads yearn for. So skip the “debate” about who “Q” is or might be or include ... go to the heart of the matter - for example, a recent subject of discussion first outside the “Q” realm and then on these threads and, ultimately, linked or suggested by “Q”, then alluded to the CARES Act including a shift in traditional methods whereby the FED shifted trillions in $$$ to the US Treasury instead of the other way around; that is a subject in & of itself to discuss without any discussion of “Q” - things stand or fall themselves. Good Luck + WWG1WGA :)

Thanks Steven. I appreciate your suggestion, to move the discussion to a subject outside of Q... Hadn’t thought of that, and will give it a try. I really don’t like debating my son, and this can get us talking versus arguing over information...