[Paladin2]

"...in many instances size does make a difference."

Yep, given specialization of labor [and thought, development, production, etc.] the US shoulda been able to test 30% of the population.

[Robert DeLong]

While they are probably administering tests to anyone, we are at this moment limiting tests to only those showing symptoms. One thing we do agree on is that the CDC fell flat on their face and proved they were grossly unprepared for a real event to come onto the scene. That's because the CDC is run by a bunch of progressives that think they know it all.

Unfortunately, we also have a much bigger bureaucracy too. The bigger the bureaucracy the more impediments that exist, and it shows, doesn't it. 8>)

Also I don't know where to find the number of actual tests that have been administered. While I have stated many times here before, more tests should be being administered. I do not know how many tests have actually been administered, though I concede it is probably well below the 30% level as that would be around 116,666,666 tests, and that is not even counting the illegals in this country.