Sundance, aka Mark Bradman, has a long history of being wrong and banning those who point it out to him to maintain the purity of his followers. I have no use for anyone seeking to be worshipped and never challenged. Like Cates and the rest who want to get paid for bloviating on the internet, he doesn’t know anything the rest of us don’t know, or could find out from public sources, regardless of how cleverly they can string words together or unequivocally state things. That’s not to say they’re always wrong, just use common sense, seek multiple inputs and use your own good brain to evaluate and synthesize. That’s all they do.
Word, Anon
Word
I would not include Cates in the same category as Sundance. otherwise I agree with your assessment. Cates gets paid as a journalist by Epoch Times and I have no problem with that. He is very good at research and investigation and often comes up with good stuff. Sundance I have no use for.