[griffin]

H1N1 not as aggressive respirationally, or N0. Not good comparison.

[gas_dr]

Seriously? H1N1 is not aggressive respirationally? Notwithstanding your complete fabrication of a word (I think you would be better advised to say from a pulmonary standpoint), let me tell you something you arrogant child. I treated H1N1. I had a perpetually full ICU with proned and ventilated patients who were on deaths door. Many didn’t survive. It was FAR WORSE than what I am seeing now, and so you don’t get snarky in your expertise, at the same point 4 weeks into it with H1N1 as compared to this, the ICU was much worse.

To say that you know the relative aggressiveness of a disease, did you stand at beside day and night treating it? Do you have ANY EXPERTISE in the field? The only thing more overwhelming than your IGNORANCE is YOUR ARROGANCE. You are a stupid ass who is hurting patients with your unhinged statements. Sadly, you have the right to be stupid, but you do not have the right to disseminate such idiocy unchallenged.

[Lagmeister]

You are nitpicking semantics. Corona appears to have a dry cough with deep lung in the elderly or those who have weak immune systems. H1N1 was overall head, sinus and lung. Both lead to pneumonia, but the H1N1 was more deadly because it attacked with ferocity the young. There was vaccine available for H1N1 and it still killed up to 18,000 in this country.

Actually, I just recently read that 22,000 have died this year from flu... so, there's that.