[blueplum]

clunk;

that’s the sound of you joining the ignore list along with others who, instead of providing an intelligent challenge TO A POST or links therein, have nothing to offer except Alex Jones parroting and slanderous insults TOWARDS A FREEPER in an attempt to hijack the thread.

Your red herring doesn’t swim. I never said ‘bioweapons’ were ‘registered’, I said the backbones used to build viruses for research, are registered and identifiable - just like the mouse virus backbone in the study at the post I was responding to.

For those conspiracy wackos who think that some Chinese spy stole a virus from an American lab and reengineered it.

Have a nice day

[Thud]

You decried a bioweapon lab origin for CoVid-19 AND a medical research lab origin for it on the same grounds, registration and backbone. This is valid as to medical research, and ludicrous as to biowar research.

Disguising a new bioweapon's origin is an OBJECTIVE of biowar research to make it harder to defeat the attack, and particularly harder to identify the attacker so covert attacks will be more feasible.

I am very familiar with the tactic of conflating a valid claim with an invalid one, to make the invalid claim more believable, and properly called you on it. Use of that tactic goes directly to credibility. People who use it should not be trusted, and readers here should not trust you.

And you know nothing of biowar research, or just how weird Chinese politics and culture are.