Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Remain in Mexico" policy halted by judge

Posted on 02/28/2020 10:30:30 AM PST by Ronniesque

A federal appeals court in California halted the Trump administration’s “Remain in Mexico” immigration policy on Friday.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: breaking; immigration; judiciary; politicaljudiciary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 02/28/2020 10:30:30 AM PST by Ronniesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ronniesque

Overruled in 3,2,1.


2 posted on 02/28/2020 10:31:29 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronniesque

Will get overturned............


3 posted on 02/28/2020 10:31:31 AM PST by Red Badger (If people were to God like dogs are to people, the world would be a really great place..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronniesque

Let me guess: another Obama/Clinton panel.


4 posted on 02/28/2020 10:31:49 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Not a panel, just one judge.


5 posted on 02/28/2020 10:32:56 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ronniesque

Links are your friend


6 posted on 02/28/2020 10:33:08 AM PST by stockpirate (Anyone who believes Epstein killed himself is a fool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronniesque
Here's a link, from Pollutico:

Judge halts Trump administration’s ‘remain in Mexico’ policy

7 posted on 02/28/2020 10:34:07 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Hillary Clinton: Just like Joe with only half the dementia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronniesque

It seems like it’s taking the Left longer and longer to find a compliant judge these days. That’s a good thing. Winning!!


8 posted on 02/28/2020 10:35:12 AM PST by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Normally would but on company phone and just heard a blurb on radio about this...can someone put in a suitable link? Thanks.


9 posted on 02/28/2020 10:35:18 AM PST by Ronniesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Let me guess: another Obama/Clinton panel.

Yep.

San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg, appointed by Bronco Bama...


10 posted on 02/28/2020 10:36:07 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Hillary Clinton: Just like Joe with only half the dementia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Thanks for adding link...was on company phone and heard blurb on radio about this, so no time to get it in.


11 posted on 02/28/2020 10:36:17 AM PST by Ronniesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Yup, another Obama appointee forumed shopped by the ACLU. Of course, a San Fran based Judge.


12 posted on 02/28/2020 10:36:17 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate; Ronniesque
Links are your friend

See #7...

13 posted on 02/28/2020 10:37:42 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Hillary Clinton: Just like Joe with only half the dementia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Bastard!


14 posted on 02/28/2020 10:37:57 AM PST by JoSixChip (I'm an American Nationalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Sorry your judgeship. You ain’t in charge. So, fah Q


15 posted on 02/28/2020 10:37:58 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ronniesque; All
Text:

A federal judge today halted the Trump administration’s “remain in Mexico” policy, which forces certain non-Mexican asylum seekers to wait in Mexico during their court proceedings.

The plaintiffs — a group of asylum seekers and organizations represented by the American Civil Liberties Union — argued the policy violates U.S. asylum law, international treaty obligations and federal regulatory requirements.

In a 27-page order, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg issued a preliminary injunction against the policy, a decision that represents another legal setback for the Trump administration’s hard-line immigration agenda. The order will take effect Friday at 8 p.m. EDT (5 p.m. PDT), which will provide the administration time to seek a stay from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.

The ruling did not tackle the question of whether DHS has the authority to send asylum seekers to Mexico. Instead, it found that plaintiffs were likely to demonstrate that the policy did not comply with federal regulatory law.

ACLU asserted in a February court filing that the policy — formally known as the “Migrant Protection Protocols” — put migrants at risk of kidnapping, sexual assault, trafficking and murder in Mexico.

Seeborg, nominated to the district court in 2009 by former President Barack Obama, found the policy was not supported by federal immigration law and did not sufficiently safeguard the lives and freedom of migrants.

The policy had been publicly championed by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, whose resignation was tweeted out Sunday by President Donald Trump.

The Mexican government described it as a unilateral move by the United States, but agreed to allow access to their territory for humanitarian reasons.

16 posted on 02/28/2020 10:38:03 AM PST by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Whew.


17 posted on 02/28/2020 10:38:42 AM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

With virus concerns around, this is just impeccable timing by that judge...hope it is indeed overturned and fast.


18 posted on 02/28/2020 10:38:56 AM PST by Ronniesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Article is from last April!


19 posted on 02/28/2020 10:40:07 AM PST by BohDaThone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson
Not a panel, just one judge.

Angling to get an award from LaRaza or the American Liberal Civil Liberties Union or to make Bernie's shortlist of potential SCOTUS nominees.


20 posted on 02/28/2020 10:40:07 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson