Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EXCLUSIVE: Defiant Meghan tells friends there's nothing 'legally stopping' her and Prince Harry from using their Sussex Royal name, despite Queen banning them from using it
DM ^ | 2/21/2020 | CHEYENNE ROUNDTREE FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Posted on 02/21/2020 10:51:53 AM PST by RummyChick

Meghan Markle has told friends there is nothing 'legally stopping' her and Prince Harry from using their Sussex Royal name, despite the Queen banning them from using it, DailyMail.com has learned.

The 38-year-old complained to her inner circle that using the name 'shouldn't even be an issue in the first place and it's not like they want to be in the business of selling T-shirts and pencils,' the insider said.

They added: 'Meghan said she's done with the drama and has no room in her life for naysayers, and the same goes for Harry.'

On Tuesday, DailyMail revealed the Queen and senior officials agreed the two could no longer keep the word 'royal' in their 'branding', despite the likely thousands of dollars Meghan and Harry have already sunk into their website and trademark

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: megxit; royalgrifters; royals; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-209 next last
To: silverleaf

LOL

She sure did.

She is not going to be welcomed back in the UK by the people. Oh sure, some will like her..but she will never be able to go back to the UK and function.

I think the big thing they have been worried about is Meghan flouting the race card.

So they are letting Meghan destroy herself.


101 posted on 02/21/2020 11:40:04 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

I feel really bad for the child. And saw a rumor she might be pregnant again?


102 posted on 02/21/2020 11:40:52 AM PST by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Harry married an Ugly American.


103 posted on 02/21/2020 11:42:33 AM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Are you referring to “The Windsors” that was recently on CNN? I wanted to watch that but somehow missed it. I don’t watch CNN of course but tried to record it but must have forgotten.

Or are you referring to the one called The Windsors on Netflix?

I have only watched The Crown, a really good series but I want to see those documentaries.


104 posted on 02/21/2020 11:44:32 AM PST by BlueHorseShoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
I think Prince Harry was generally a good guy. After all, he volunteered to be a ground troop in Afghanistan with his unit, and it only leaked out when the media violated the rules. He didn’t want any accolades for it. Then he went on to become an Apache helicopter pilot, which is no small feat and requires quite a bit of courage.

Harry was never “woke,” and caught up in all of this climate change nonsense before he met Markel. I think he still suffers from deep emotional trauma at the loss of his mother, Princess Diana. Perhaps he saw marrying Megan Markel as a way of getting back at the royal family in someway? Perhaps he blames them for his mother being divorced from the royal family when she died? In any case, he’s a troubled soul. If he is ever going to find redemption, I fear he’s going to have to break away from this ghastly woman.

105 posted on 02/21/2020 11:44:33 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: pnz1

I guess I am just too old and cynical... I would like to see this whole thing in a different light, I really would... I would love to die being proven completely wrong, because this is not going to end in any way that is going to be good for anyone involved, except perhaps for Meghan who can milk the notoriety for the rest of her life.... but will devastate everyone else around it..... If it is anything like my cynical experienced self sees this....

I would love to be proven wrong here... I truly would... and I hope I am proven wrong... but I can’t say that in my heart of hearts that I think I will be proven wrong....


106 posted on 02/21/2020 11:45:00 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
They should do a DNA test and see if he is even a royal.
He may not even be Charles’ son.

Now that would be a ROYAL SCANDAL!

107 posted on 02/21/2020 11:45:02 AM PST by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord ~ Psalm 32:12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: pnz1

Diana wanted to leave the UK with her kids but wasn’t allowed to do it. Archie isn’t a soon to be King so maybe Meghan gets more leeway.

Or maybe Harry really isn’t royal. Interesting that Meghan brought up Royal Blood in her sabre rattling.

I do think he is Prince Charles son but is interesting that red headed guy keeps a picture of Prince Harry in his bedroom and has no other pictures.


108 posted on 02/21/2020 11:45:03 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Lol.

You can call yourself anything you want too.

There’re no such things and kings and queens and princesses etc...

Anyone can call himself anything.

Is Prince Jammy really a prince?


109 posted on 02/21/2020 11:45:39 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pnz1

“Harry and Archie have royal blood “

So they say, but we don’t know that for sure.


110 posted on 02/21/2020 11:46:24 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength" - Corrie ten Boom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Queen Elizabeth II, for most practical purposes, has been the most powerful woman in the world for 67 years.

Meghan Markle has been “royalty”, on whim of a prince, for 2 years.

Latter would do well to learn from the former, not fight her.
(Which is baffling: Meghan has an incredible opportunity; while she may not become Queen, she has a chance to learn from & become a favorite thereof - to tremendous personal benefit. Instead, she’s burning the bridge to power & wealth before crossing it.)


111 posted on 02/21/2020 11:47:00 AM PST by ctdonath2 (Democrats oppose democracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Narcissists leave destruction in their wake. It’s how she has lived her life.

I don’t know if she is technically one as per official guidelines..but she seems like it.


112 posted on 02/21/2020 11:47:16 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

“A d list “actress” at best, telling the Queen of England what she will do.....let’s see how this plays out.”

That grinding sound at the Tower of London is an axe being sharpened.


113 posted on 02/21/2020 11:48:09 AM PST by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Meghan will be a self made billionare within five years. You don’t have to start a business or invent something to become a billionare. What you do have to do is attract attention. She is following the Kardasian business model of being a train wreck that people can’t take their eyes off, and then monetizing that attention with products.


114 posted on 02/21/2020 11:48:42 AM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

UK has very specific laws. She cannot use Royal in the UK

There is a certain time period..I think around things like Jubilees...where the Queen grants an exception for a certain time frame.


115 posted on 02/21/2020 11:48:42 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

“UK has very specific laws.”

What law?


116 posted on 02/21/2020 11:49:41 AM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn

“The Royals are intentionally letting her cut herself loose from the Crown.”

Queen probably took a deep breath, smiled, and said to herself, “Sometimes these things just work themselves out.”


117 posted on 02/21/2020 11:49:53 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength" - Corrie ten Boom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: stars & stripes forever
Have you ever seen a picture of Diana's alleged boyfriend?\
118 posted on 02/21/2020 11:50:32 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: pnz1

There’s a lot to be said for arranged marriages when it comes to royalty.


119 posted on 02/21/2020 11:51:23 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Ace has a story up showing the craziness of that world. Not sure if it is a Kardashian, though.

The person is seeing the attention people are getting about transgender issues (see the recent story of Gabrielle Union) and is thinking about dressing up the kid as the other sex to get attention.

I am never right about guessing who it is. It’s insane

https://blindgossip.com/her-little-experiment/#more-100205


120 posted on 02/21/2020 11:53:49 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson