[generally]

Not a complaint about your post. I'm grateful. But an observation.....

In the original the second "re:" is not in bold. Here is what I see:

Thank you, Baker(s)!

THE BEST IS YET TO COME!

[re: MSM] when facts and truth are NOT on your side what tactics must be

deployed?

[PS], what 'visibly' happens [re: [hidden] rats] during a fire?

Q

------------

So I am wondering if the bold / non-bold has any significance.

[truthluva]

The file name on the image is ‘F_NewsEx3820.png’. I’m thinking for: Fake News Example 3820. I get the fake news part, but wasn’t sure 3820 could mean so I checked post 3820. (sorry, can’t copy it on this device.)

It’s the one with the meme of Pelosi, Schiff, Cummings and Nadler which says It’s about making sure you don’t find out about their corruption. It also has a link to a Fox News article regarding Schiff’s ties to Igor Pasternak.

[BlessedBeGod]

So I am wondering if the bold / non-bold has any significance.

I thought it was the aggregator sites that did the bolding. I'm pretty sure that back on 8chan nothing was bolded. I haven't been to 8K so I don't know how it looks there to compare.

[BiggBob]

Sorry but the original does not have bold type

The repost from the aggregate site does
.

But because the original is not bold neither was mine