You’re in a box. Playing by the antiquated rules of warfare, presuming they still work, today, is a condition for “normalcy bias”.
Forget it, baby. “We Have IT ALL.”
TREASON can net the Military Tribunal Court and is punishable by death.
Be happy that Senator Graham skipped all “normalcy bias”, with SC Justice Kavanaugh during the latter’s Confirmation hearing, and together they resolved any question concerning the strength of using Military Trials for TREASON.
Should we explore the concept that ALL TREASON should be, necessarily, tried in Military Courts?
I think there are arguments on both sides. One side (CON) will point to many of the actors being civilians, not uniformed soldiers.
Another side (PRO) would point out that we are still under a declaration of war (And, not forgetting that John Brennan is a Muslim).
Last, but not least, there are those that say the UCMJ is intended ONLY for Americans (while, at the same, time saying the Constitution is for citizens of the world).
Didn’t Bush43 say it was “a WAR against Islamo-fascism”?