Posted on 02/14/2020 12:34:51 PM PST by ransomnote
Sounds like he needs to be taken on a snipe hunt.
—
That could be fun alright.
I think I’d rather see him put in a field barefoot & runner’s shorts & a typically very hostile large bull & lots of fresh cow pies.
Therein lies the rub on just about anything. Can I even get the raw material all in America or at least not China? I've been in the food business, and man is it hard work. I'm too old for that especially if it has anything to do with leavening.
Barrons says, Chinas Coronavirus numbers look like they were cooked up by computer, and may be fake. They say, A near-perfect 99.99% of variance is explained by the equation, this person said, referring to a statistical measure known as r-squared. Thats a fancy way of saying that the data updating the number of deaths was almost perfectly predictable. This never happens with real data, which is always noisy.
I didn’t want to post it on the main board for fear of getting a suspension. No matter, Kaslin posted it sometime midday.
thanx...I’m using Vilvadi. I probably have some switch set or not set.
I’ll now go back in.
I wonder if there's something I could 3-D print that comes only from China.
cripes...it’s “Vivaldi”...dyslexic fingers...
Yeah, folks should stay away from the Chinese BM mix for sure.
I think Id rather see him put in a field barefoot & runners shorts & a typically very hostile large bull & lots of fresh cow pies.
******************************************************************************************
We always had the snipe hunt in a field of cows. Lots of pies. LOL
"... does that represent a clear and present danger to the United States of America?
Is there a reason Q uses this specific phrase?
NEW Q POSTS
FEB.17, 2020
START AT #972
983
I have no clue about 3-D printing stuff. DH works with all kinds of parts for plumbing, electric, tools and parts and on and on and the ones made in China which are often all that is available are total junk. Even drill bits. Use once and toss.
Since the “clear and present danger” test doesnt’ seem to the current standard, is Q signaling a Supreme Court will now rule it as the standard again??
“... does that represent a clear and present danger to the United States of America?
Is there a reason Q uses this specific phrase?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gotta have some specific legal/constitutional purpose and meaning. Actionable.
Did a quick search:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_and_present_danger
Clear and present danger was a doctrine adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States to determine under what circumstances limits can be placed on First Amendment freedoms of speech, press, or assembly. The test was replaced in 1969 with Brandenburg v. Ohio’s “imminent lawless action” test.
LOTS more at link.
In 1969, the court established stronger protections for speech in the landmark case Brandenburg v. Ohio, which held that "the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action".[30][31] Brandenburg is now the standard applied by the Court to free speech issues related to advocacy of violence.
Thanks! It seems if it is no longer the standard, Q must know this, yet keeps using it...
Perhaps a change is coming??
I see what you did there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.