Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nadler’s panic letter to Barr demands to know why DOJ is looking at Giuliani’s Biden-Ukraine info
Biz Pac Review ^ | 2/11/20 | Victor Rantala

Posted on 02/11/2020 5:55:42 PM PST by Libloather

It’s as if the barnyard animals sense the wolf pack circling and approaching ever closer. The latest screeching and squealing noises heard from the corralled Democrats in D.C. are coming from House Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler who sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr expressing “serious concern” about the Department of Justice (DOJ) receiving Biden-Ukraine information from Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani “outside of normal channels.”

Nadler’s four-page letter charged that the process by which the DOJ has accepted info from Giuliani “would seem to be a significant departure from traditional channels,” and he demanded answers regarding the DOJ’s new “intake process” involved in receiving that material.

He also raised questions about “conflicts of interest–both for the Department, generally, and for you [Barr], specifically.”

Nadler wrote: “Whether or not you are in league with Mr. Giuliani and his associates, DOJ guidelines and regulations exist to protect you and the Department from even the appearance of a conflict of interest or any impropriety,” after referring to allegations by Giuliani associate Lev Parnas that Barr was connected to the effort to collect info on the Bidens in Ukraine.

(Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Miscellaneous; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: barr; biden; deepstate; nadler; pain; ukraine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Where was Nadless when Hussein was shipping arms to the drug cartels?
1 posted on 02/11/2020 5:55:42 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Nadler did a whole fake but accurate impeachment based on information from a “whistleblower”.


2 posted on 02/11/2020 5:57:15 PM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Ever seen a pig sweat? Rudy! Rudy!


3 posted on 02/11/2020 5:57:50 PM PST by Kudsman (Im trying to love the tolerant left. They make it very hard to do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

LOL


4 posted on 02/11/2020 5:57:58 PM PST by dontreadthis (A TIMELINE OF TREASON on Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Sounds like Nadler is OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, at least to me.

Perhaps it’s time for an investigation?


5 posted on 02/11/2020 5:58:41 PM PST by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Right; because Nadbreath is a real stickler for due process. /s


6 posted on 02/11/2020 5:58:58 PM PST by Boomer ('Democrat' is now synonymous with 'corrupt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

after referring to allegations by Giuliani associate Lev Parnas


A liar has got to lie.


7 posted on 02/11/2020 5:59:01 PM PST by old curmudgeon (There is no situation so terrible, so disgraceful, that the federal government can not make worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

We don’t comment on pending indictments.


8 posted on 02/11/2020 6:00:00 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Nads looks like he’s about to stroke out lately.


9 posted on 02/11/2020 6:00:05 PM PST by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot acce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

IMPEACH GIULIANI!


10 posted on 02/11/2020 6:00:16 PM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Is Nadler attempting to obstruct justice?


11 posted on 02/11/2020 6:00:41 PM PST by Prolixus (In all seriousness:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“...would seem to be a significant departure from traditional channels...”

Nadler harping on breaking traditional channels? Ohhhhhh myyyyyyy!

Hypocrite Maximus.

Pending-Replacement Anxiety (PRA)


12 posted on 02/11/2020 6:00:52 PM PST by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prolixus

Is Nadler attempting to obstruct justice?

Lock the fat f-ing toad up.


13 posted on 02/11/2020 6:01:24 PM PST by samtheman (Trump TV Ad: Virginia takes guns. NY legalizes crime. Iowa steals votes. What Democrats do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Who makes DOJ regulations, if not the AG and the President?


14 posted on 02/11/2020 6:02:31 PM PST by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

e demanded answers regarding the DOJ’s new “intake process” involved in receiving that material.

Nadler wasn’t too interested in keeping with policy, procedure or tradition when a Dem operative, amazingly, rewrote the so called, Whistleblower Policy, so they could try another way to get rid of the President since Mueller, et al bombed.


15 posted on 02/11/2020 6:03:29 PM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

16 posted on 02/11/2020 6:04:15 PM PST by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Just reply that the info came from an anonymous whistleblower whose identity will never be revealed.


17 posted on 02/11/2020 6:04:28 PM PST by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Correct. Unless these processes are codified in law, fatboy has no say so in the matter.


18 posted on 02/11/2020 6:05:16 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Trump didn’t want an AG, he wanted a consigliere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The DoJ should look at it, just like they should have looked at the Trump accusations. If nothing is found or verified, it then gets dropped.

Tada. That’s the way it is supposed to work, not creating false charges and submitting falsified records to the FISA Court.


19 posted on 02/11/2020 6:06:15 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Because Biden has never been acquitted.


20 posted on 02/11/2020 6:07:33 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Everyone knows Hillary was corrupt, lied, destroyed documents, and influenced witnesses. Rat crime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson