There is the misrepresentation of the source material and official statements, without any real effort to understand them. This is what the AFB article explains.
One of my issues with conspiracy theories is how the conspiracy is supposed to work is a series of assumptions that are rarely fully explained. If those assumptions were explained, then the conspiracy falls apart. The risk and chance of failure are so high no one would attempt it.
The title is "Corona virus developed in Canada and stolen by China?" by Eeyore. This is an accusation posed as a question, which the author does not try to answer. It is true that Dr. Xiangguo Qiu and several students were removed from her job at Canada's BSL-4 lab, and that is worth noting right now. The title implies that she stole the Coronavirus which caused the current epidemic.
I'm going to spell out how the conspiracy that Eeyore does not:
1. Dr. Qui smuggled infectious material out of the lab, without being detected.
2. No one at the lab noticed material or a experiment was missing.
3. Somehow it got to Wuhan from Canada without getting found or (4) accidentally released.
5. Somehow it was released in Wuhan, when precautions were taken to get it to Wuhan.
6. There was a reason to get Coronavirus samples from Canada, when there are two BSL-4 labs in Wuhan.
Which makes this pretty far fetched.
We’ve got a Panda-hugger here.