[little jeremiah]

3841
New: Title TBD
Q
!!Hs1Jq13jV6
7 Feb 2020 - 9:14:20 AM
[image of drop from 2/12/19
DzNz3avVsAEkayI.jpg

https://twitter.com/M2Madness/status/1225606976912199680

If dirty cops ran the investigation into the DNC breach, could an argument be made that it was corrupt?
If dirty cops ran the investigation into election interference, could an argument be made that it was corrupt?
If dirty cops ran the investigation into [HRC] private server/email scandal, could an argument be made that it was corrupt?
RUSSIA DID NOT ‘HACK’ [penetrate] THE DNC SERVER.
>internal DL / release
>crowdstrike manipulation of source
RUSSIA DID NOT INTERFERE WITH US ELECTION OF 2016.
>crowdstrike manipulation of source
The truth will be made public.
Q

[little jeremiah]

Oh good, someone got the whole thing.

[little jeremiah]

BIgger 2/12/19 drop Q reposted:

[ClearCase_guy]

RUSSIA DID NOT INTERFERE WITH US ELECTION OF 2016.

I totally agree with this.

However, the media is likely to say that Russia bought perhaps $10,000 in Facebook ads for Hillary (or Trump) and that therefore it is a lie to say they did not interfere.

It's Clintonian wordsmithing, but they love to do it.