“Corporations that tolerate that end up going down in the end.”
Obviously that can’t actually be true or people would have stopped hiring them long ago, or corporations that continued to hire them would all be defunct and we wouldn’t be discussing this.
Believe what you want, as I said, been there seen that.
Maybe you could provide an example of a corporation being more successful then another when run by an individual who willfully commits acts of violence, engages in threatening behavior towards those around them, and in general skews the rules to reward themselves disproportionately and with out regard for shareholder value.
Since you seem to believe that such behavior is acceptable in places like public companies.